Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34866770›Full record

ArticleComputers in human behavior2021

Machine learning techniques and older adults processing of online information and misinformation: A covid 19 study.

Jyoti Choudrie, Snehasish Banerjee, Ketan Kotecha, Rahee Walambe, Hema Karende, Juhi Ameta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in human behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Infodemic: Challenges and solutions in topic discovery and data process.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A scoping review of digital health interventions for combating COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The effect of pecha-kucha training on fear and belief in myths of COVID-19 in elderly women.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jyoti ChoudrieUniversity of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire Business School, DeHavilland Campus, Hatfield. Herts, AL109EU, UK.
Snehasish BanerjeeYork Management School, University of York, Freboys Lane, YO10 5GD, UK.
Ketan KotechaSymbiosis Centre for Applied Artificial Intelligence (SCAAI), Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune. Symbiosis (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, 412115, India.
Rahee WalambeSymbiosis Centre for Applied Artificial Intelligence (SCAAI), Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune. Symbiosis (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, 412115, India.
Hema KarendeSymbiosis Centre for Applied Artificial Intelligence (SCAAI), Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune. Symbiosis (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, 412115, India.
Juhi AmetaSymbiosis Centre for Applied Artificial Intelligence (SCAAI), Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Pune. Symbiosis (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, 412115, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is informed by two research gaps. One, Artificial Intelligence's (AI's) Machine Learning (ML) techniques have the potential to help separate information and misinformation, but this capability has yet to be empirically verified in the context of COVID-19. Two, while older adults can be particularly susceptible to the virus as well as its online infodemic, their information processing behaviour amid the pandemic has not been understood. Therefore, this study explores and understands how ML techniques (Study 1), and humans, particularly older adults (Study 2), process the online infodemic regarding COVID-19 prevention and cure. Study 1 employed ML techniques to classify information and misinformation. They achieved a classification accuracy of 86.7% with the Decision Tree classifier, and 86.67% with the Convolutional Neural Network model. Study 2 then investigated older adults' information processing behaviour during the COVID-19 infodemic period using some of the posts from Study 1. Twenty older adults were interviewed. They were found to be more willing to trust traditional media rather than new media. They were often left confused about the veracity of online content related to COVID-19 prevention and cure. Overall, the paper breaks new ground by highlighting how humans' information processing differs from how algorithms operate. It offers fresh insights into how during a pandemic, older adults-a vulnerable demographic segment-interact with online information and misinformation. On the methodological front, the paper represents an intersection of two very disparate paradigms-ML techniques and interview data analyzed using thematic analysis and concepts drawn from grounded theory to enrich the scholarly understanding of human interaction with cutting-edge technologies.

Indexed as

AICOVID-19 pandemicInformation-misinformationInterviewMachine learning techniquesOlder adult

Identifiers

PMID34866770
PMCPMC8631531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.