ArticleJournal of business research2022
Understanding patterns of COVID infodemic: A systematic and pragmatic approach to curb fake news.
Article in Journal of business research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Social Media and the Influence of Fake News on Global Health Interventions: Implications for a Study on Dengue in Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Trial
- The role of AI in combating misinformation: leveraging text mining and social networking analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gaps in dengue fever knowledge, attitudes, and practices among healthcare professionals in southeastern Iran.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Does fact-checking COVID-19 fake news on social media correct readers' false beliefs? A study of Chinese youths.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Where should "Humans" be in "One Health"? Lessons from COVID-19 for One Health.Globalization and health · 2024Article
- COVID-19 coverage from six network and cable news sources in the United States: Representation of misinformation, correction, and portrayals of severity.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2024Article
- The coronavirus disease 2019 infodemic: a concept analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- In the COVID-19 pandemic, who did we trust? An eight-country cross-sectional study.Journal of global health · 2023Article
- Social Media, Anxiety and COVID-19 Lockdown Measurement Compliance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Monkeypox: New epidemic or fake news? Study of psychological and social factors associated with fake news attitudes of monkeypox in Italy.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- A comparative analysis of the COVID-19 Infodemic in English and Chinese: insights from social media textual data.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- The characteristics of online gerontophobia expressions in South Korea.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review.Social network analysis and mining · 2023Review
- Agenda-Setting for COVID-19: A Study of Large-Scale Economic News Coverage Using Natural Language Processing.International journal of data science and analytics · 2023Article
- Who falls for fake news? Psychological and clinical profiling evidence of fake news consumers.Personality and individual differences · 2023Article
- Detecting fake news and disinformation using artificial intelligence and machine learning to avoid supply chain disruptions.Annals of operations research · 2022Article
- Understanding Factors to COVID-19 Vaccine Adoption in Gujarat, India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Online Information of COVID-19: Visibility and Characterization of Highest Positioned Websites by Google between March and April 2020-A Cross-Country Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Suicide, Stigma and COVID-19: A Call for Action From Low and Middle Income Countries.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- A Cross-sectional Study of Antecedents and Consequence of Panic Buying Behavior: The Moderating Effect of COVID-19 Rumors.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amid the flood of fake news on Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), now referred to as COVID-19 infodemic, it is critical to understand the nature and characteristics of COVID-19 infodemic since it not only results in altered individual perception and behavior shift such as irrational preventative actions but also presents imminent threat to the public safety and health. In this study, we build on First Amendment theory, integrate text and network analytics and deploy a three-pronged approach to develop a deeper understanding of COVID-19 infodemic. The first prong uses Latent Direchlet Allocation (LDA) to identify topics and key themes that emerge in COVID-19 fake and real news. The second prong compares and contrasts different emotions in fake and real news. The third prong uses network analytics to understand various network-oriented characteristics embedded in the COVID-19 real and fake news such as page rank algorithms, betweenness centrality, eccentricity and closeness centrality. This study carries important implications for building next generation trustworthy technology by providing strong guidance for the design and development of fake news detection and recommendation systems for coping with COVID-19 infodemic. Additionally, based on our findings, we provide actionable system focused guidelines for dealing with immediate and long-term threats from COVID-19 infodemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.