Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34866614›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2021

Predicting the performance of automated crystallographic model-building pipelines.

Emad Alharbi, Paul Bond, Radu Calinescu, Kevin Cowtan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Buccaneer model building with neural network fragment selection.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emad AlharbiDepartment of Computer Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5GH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8476-4865
Paul BondDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8465-4823
Radu CalinescuDepartment of Computer Science, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5GH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2678-9260
Kevin CowtanDepartment of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0189-1437

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L006383/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S005099/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are macromolecules that perform essential biological functions which depend on their three-dimensional structure. Determining this structure involves complex laboratory and computational work. For the computational work, multiple software pipelines have been developed to build models of the protein structure from crystallographic data. Each of these pipelines performs differently depending on the characteristics of the electron-density map received as input. Identifying the best pipeline to use for a protein structure is difficult, as the pipeline performance differs significantly from one protein structure to another. As such, researchers often select pipelines that do not produce the best possible protein models from the available data. Here, a software tool is introduced which predicts key quality measures of the protein structures that a range of pipelines would generate if supplied with a given crystallographic data set. These measures are crystallographic quality-of-fit indicators based on included and withheld observations, and structure completeness. Extensive experiments carried out using over 2500 data sets show that the tool yields accurate predictions for both experimental phasing data sets (at resolutions between 1.2 and 4.0 Å) and molecular-replacement data sets (at resolutions between 1.0 and 3.5 Å). The tool can therefore provide a recommendation to the user concerning the pipelines that should be run in order to proceed most efficiently to a depositable model.

Indexed as

Protein ConformationAutomationCrystallography, X-RayProteinsSoftwareProteinsautomated pipelinesmodel buildingpredictionsoftwarestructure solution

Identifiers

PMID34866614
PMCPMC8647178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.