Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34866487›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2022

A critical incident study of ICU nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ann Rhéaume, Myriam Breau, Stéphanie Boudreau

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Optimizing Academic-Practice Partnerships to Promote Transition to Nursing Practice.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Myriam Breau
Stéphanie BoudreauUniversité de Moncton, Canada.
Université de Moncton · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive care unit nurses are providing care to COVID-19 patients in a stressful environment. Understanding intensive care unit nurses' sources of distress is important when planning interventions to support them. PURPOSE: To describe Canadian intensive care unit nurse experiences providing care to COVID-19 patients during the second wave of the pandemic.

designQualitative descriptive component within a larger mixed-methods study. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Participants were invited to write down their experiences of a critical incident, which distressed them when providing nursing care. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The study was approved by the ethics committee at the researchers' university in eastern Canada.

resultsA total of 111 critical incidents were written by 108 nurses. Four themes were found: (1) managing the pandemic, (2) witness to families' grief, (3) our safety, and (4) futility of care. Many nurses' stories also focused on the organizational preparedness of their institutions and concerns over their own safety. DISCUSSION: Nurses experienced moral distress in relation to family and patient issues. Situations related to insufficient institutional support, patient, and family traumas, as well as safety issues have left nurses deeply distressed.

conclusionIdentifying situations that distress intensive care unit nurses can lead to targeted interventions mitigating their negative consequences by providing a safe work environment and improving nurses' well-being.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical Care NursingNursesCanadaHumansIntensive Care UnitsMoralsPandemicsQualitative ResearchCOVID-19critical incident techniqueintensive care nursepandemicqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID34866487
PMCPMC8958639
OpenAlexW4200496826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.