Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34866120›Full record

ArticleAnnals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia2023

Salvage Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy after Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: A Case Report.

Ryohei Sasamori, Satoru Motoyama, Yusuke Sato, Akiyuki Wakita, Yushi Nagaki, Kazuhiro Imai, Yoshihiro Minamiya

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy: Current Situation and Future Perspectives.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryohei SasamoriEsophageal Surgery, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Akita, Japan.
Satoru MotoyamaEsophageal Surgery, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Akita, Japan.
Yusuke SatoEsophageal Surgery, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Akita, Japan.
Akiyuki WakitaEsophageal Surgery, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Akita, Japan.
Yushi NagakiEsophageal Surgery, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Akita, Japan.
Kazuhiro ImaiThoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Akita, Japan.
Yoshihiro MinamiyaThoracic Surgery, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Akita, Japan.
Akita University · JPAkita University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advantages of salvage esophagectomy through robotic-assisted surgery for patients with clinically diagnosed tumor invasion of adjacent vital organs (cT4b) or patients with scar tissue from definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) are still only rarely reported. A man in his 60s with middle thoracic esophageal cancer (cT4b [left main bronchus] N1 M0 cStage IIIC) received dCRT (60 Gy). After the chemoradiotherapy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a residual primary tumor, and we performed robotic-assisted thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction via a retrosternal route with three-field lymphadenectomy. Although it was difficult to dissect the tumor from adjacent organs, especially the left main bronchus and left inferior pulmonary vein, due to loss of the dissecting layer and scarring, R0 surgery was achieved. With robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, the high-magnification, high-resolution, and three-dimensional images; the stable surgical field with full countertraction made with the robotic arm forceps, which were readily adjusted; and the stable motion of the robotic arm without physiological tremor are considerable advantages for salvage esophagectomy for cT4b tumors. It goes without saying that sufficient experience with robot-assisted surgery and sufficient understanding and surgical skill in esophageal cancer surgery under suitable surgical indications and timing are required to make use of these advantages.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresChemoradiotherapyEsophagectomyHumansMaleSalvage TherapyTreatment Outcomedefinitive chemoradiotherapyrobotic-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomysalvage surgery

Identifiers

PMID34866120
PMCPMC10126768
OpenAlexW4226348037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.