Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34865195›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022

Development and application of an in-house library and workflow for gas chromatography-electron ionization-accurate-mass/high-resolution mass spectrometry screening of environmental samples.

Verónica Castro, José Benito Quintana, Javier López-Vázquez, Nieves Carro, Julio Cobas, Denis Bilbao, Rafael Cela, Rosario Rodil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Verónica CastroDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Research On Chemical and Biological Analysis (IAQBUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
José Benito QuintanaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Research On Chemical and Biological Analysis (IAQBUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. jb.quintana@usc.es.
Javier López-VázquezDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Research On Chemical and Biological Analysis (IAQBUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Nieves CarroINTECMAR - Technological Institute for the Monitoring of the Marine Environment of Galicia, Peirao de Vilaxoán S/N, 36611, Vilagarcía de Arousa, Spain.
Julio CobasINTECMAR - Technological Institute for the Monitoring of the Marine Environment of Galicia, Peirao de Vilaxoán S/N, 36611, Vilagarcía de Arousa, Spain.
Denis BilbaoDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940, Leioa, Spain.
Rafael CelaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Research On Chemical and Biological Analysis (IAQBUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Rosario RodilDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Research On Chemical and Biological Analysis (IAQBUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. rosario.rodil@usc.es.
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESCentro Tecnolóxico de Telecomunicacións de Galicia · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2020-117686RB-C32Agencia Estatal de Investigación ref. CTM2017-84763-C3-R-2Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia ED431C 2021/06Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia ED481A-2017/156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work presents an optimized gas chromatography-electron ionization-high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-EI-HRMS) screening method. Different method parameters affecting data processing with the Agilent Unknowns Analysis SureMass deconvolution software were optimized in order to achieve the best compromise between false positives and false negatives. To this end, an accurate-mass library of 26 model compounds was created. Then, five replicates of mussel extracts were spiked with a mixture of these 26 compounds at two concentration levels (10 and 100 ng/g dry weight in mussel, 50 and 500 ng/mL in extract) and injected in the GC-EI-HRMS system. The results of these experiments showed that accurate mass tolerance and pure weight factor (combination of reverse-forward library search) are the most critical factors. The validation of the developed method afforded screening detection limits in the 2.5-5 ng range for passive sampler extracts and 1-2 ng/g for mussel sample extracts, and limits of quantification in the 0.6-3.2 ng and 0.1-1.8 ng/g range, for the same type of samples, respectively, for 17 model analytes. Once the method was optimized, an accurate-mass HRMS library, containing retention indexes, with ca. 355 spectra of derivatized and non-derivatized compounds was generated. This library (freely available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5647960 ), together with a modified Agilent Pesticides Library of over 800 compounds, was applied to the screening of passive samplers, both of polydimethylsiloxane and polar chemical integrative samplers (POCIS), and mussel samples collected in Galicia (NW Spain), where a total of 75 chemicals could be identified.

Indexed as

BivalviaPesticidesAnimalsElectronsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryWorkflowPesticidesContaminants of emerging concern (CECs)Gas chromatography–quadrupole time of flight (GC-QTOF)Kovats retention indexMatrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD)Persistent organic pollutants (POPs)

Identifiers

PMID34865195
PMCPMC9372009
OpenAlexW4200264695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.