Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34865178›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2022

Topographical functional correlates of interindividual differences in executive functions in young healthy twins.

Arianna Menardi, Andrew E Reineberg, Louisa L Smith, Chiara Favaretto, Antonino Vallesi, Marie T Banich, Emiliano Santarnecchi

Open access · hybridAbstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Altered Brain-Behavior Association During Resting State is a Potential Psychosis Risk Marker.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Arianna MenardiPrecision Neuroscience and Neuromodulation Program, Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew E ReinebergInstitute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Louisa L SmithDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Chiara FavarettoPadova Neuroscience Center & Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padua, PD, Italy.
Antonino VallesiPadova Neuroscience Center & Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padua, PD, Italy.
Marie T Banich *Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Emiliano SantarnecchiPrecision Neuroscience and Neuromodulation Program, Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. esantarnecchi@mgh.harvard.edu.
University of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Padua · ITGordon Center for Medical Imaging · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Colorado Adoption/Twin Study of Lifespan behavioral development & cognitive aging (CATSLife2)R01AG046938 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI REYNOLDS, CHANDRA A, WADSWORTH, SALLY J · 2015 to 2024
$18.5M
Neural Substrates of Executive Function: An fMRI Twin StudyR01MH063207 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI FRIEDMAN, NAOMI P. · 2001 to 2018
$6.5M
Executive Functions and Self-Regulation: A Twin StudyR56MH063207 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI HEWITT, JOHN K. · 2007 to 2007
$490k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046938NIH HHS MH063207NIH HHS R01 AG046938NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063207NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH063207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Executive functions (EF) are a set of higher-order cognitive abilities that enable goal-directed behavior by controlling lower-level operations. In the brain, those functions have been traditionally associated with activity in the Frontoparietal Network, but recent neuroimaging studies have challenged this view in favor of more widespread cortical involvement. In the present study, we aimed to explore whether the network that serves as critical hubs at rest, which we term network reliance, differentiate individuals as a function of their level of EF. Furthermore, we investigated whether such differences are driven by genetic as compared to environmental factors. For this purpose, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data and the behavioral testing of 453 twins from the Colorado Longitudinal Twins Study were analyzed. Separate indices of EF performance were obtained according to a bifactor unity/diversity model, distinguishing between three independent components representing: Common EF, Shifting-specific and Updating-specific abilities. Through an approach of step-wise in silico network lesioning of the individual functional connectome, we show that interindividual differences in EF are associated with different dependencies on neural networks at rest. Furthermore, these patterns show evidence of mild heritability. Such findings add knowledge to the understanding of brain states at rest and their connection with human behavior, and how they might be shaped by genetic influences.

Indexed as

ConnectomeExecutive FunctionBrainCognitionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain topologyExecutive functionsGraph theoryHeritabilityTwins study

Identifiers

PMID34865178
PMCPMC8741656
OpenAlexW4200060172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.