Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34865031›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2021

Sex Specificity in Innate Immunity of Insect Larvae.

Irina Belousova, Sergey Pavlushin, Anna Subbotina, Natalya Rudneva, Vyacheslav Martemyanov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irina BelousovaInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Frunze str. 11, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1727-1945
Sergey PavlushinInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Frunze str. 11, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
Anna SubbotinaInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Frunze str. 11, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
Natalya RudnevaInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Frunze str. 11, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
Vyacheslav MartemyanovInstitute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals SB RAS, Frunze str. 11, Novosibirsk 630091, Russia.
Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals · RUNational Research Tomsk State University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 17-76-10029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The innate immunity of insects has been widely studied. Although the effect of sex on insect immunity has been extensively discussed, differences in immunity between the sexes of larvae insects remain largely unstudied. Studying larval sex differences in immunity may provide valuable information about the mechanisms underlying the insect immune system, which, in turn, can be valuable for the development and improvement of pest management. Here we compared the antibacterial activity in both the midgut tissue and cell-free hemolymph of Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) females and males at the larval stage without and after a challenge by entomopathogenic bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner. We also evaluated the sex-specific mortality of L. dispar induced by B. thuringiensis infection. We find that antibacterial activity in the midgut is activated by infection, but only in females. Thus, sex differences in immunity can have important effects even before sexual differentiation at adulthood.

Indexed as

Bacillus thuringiensisImmunity, InnateMothsSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBacterial InfectionsFemaleLarvaMaleLymantria disparlysozymesex

Identifiers

PMID34865031
PMCPMC8644026
OpenAlexW4200313227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.