Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34864982›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Restricted maximum-likelihood method for learning latent variance components in gene expression data with known and unknown confounders.

Muhammad Ammar Malik, Tom Michoel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammad Ammar MalikComputational Biology Unit, Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Bergen 5020, Norway.
Tom MichoelComputational Biology Unit, Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Bergen 5020, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4749-4725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random effects models are popular statistical models for detecting and correcting spurious sample correlations due to hidden confounders in genome-wide gene expression data. In applications where some confounding factors are known, estimating simultaneously the contribution of known and latent variance components in random effects models is a challenge that has so far relied on numerical gradient-based optimizers to maximize the likelihood function. This is unsatisfactory because the resulting solution is poorly characterized and the efficiency of the method may be suboptimal. Here, we prove analytically that maximum-likelihood latent variables can always be chosen orthogonal to the known confounding factors, in other words, that maximum-likelihood latent variables explain sample covariances not already explained by known factors. Based on this result, we propose a restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method that estimates the latent variables by maximizing the likelihood on the restricted subspace orthogonal to the known confounding factors and show that this reduces to probabilistic principal component analysis on that subspace. The method then estimates the variance-covariance parameters by maximizing the remaining terms in the likelihood function given the latent variables, using a newly derived analytic solution for this problem. Compared to gradient-based optimizers, our method attains greater or equal likelihood values, can be computed using standard matrix operations, results in latent factors that do not overlap with any known factors, and has a runtime reduced by several orders of magnitude. Hence, the REML method facilitates the application of random effects modeling strategies for learning latent variance components to much larger gene expression datasets than possible with current methods.

Indexed as

GenomeModels, StatisticalGene ExpressionLikelihood FunctionseQTLsgene expressionlatent factorsrandom effects model

Identifiers

PMID34864982
PMCPMC9210293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.