Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34864737›Full record

Trial reportObesity facts2022

Bone Response to High-Intensity Interval Training versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Adolescents with Obesity.

Valérie Julian, Daniela Costa, Grace O'Malley, Lore Metz, Alicia Fillon, Maud Miguet, Charlotte Cardenoux, Frédéric Dutheil, Yves Boirie, Martine Duclos and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity facts, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Valérie JulianDepartment of Sport Medicine and Functional Explorations, University Teaching Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Diet and Musculoskeletal Health Team, CRNH, INRA, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Daniela CostaUniversity of Coimbra, FCDEF, CIDAF, Coimbra, Portugal.
Grace O'MalleySchool of Physiotherapy, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, W82GO Child and Adolescent Weight Management Service, Dublin, Ireland.
Lore MetzLaboratory AME2P, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Alicia FillonLaboratory AME2P, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Maud MiguetLaboratory AME2P, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Charlotte CardenouxPediatric Medical Center of Romagnat, Romagnat, France.
Frédéric DutheilDepartment of Occupational Medicine, University Teaching Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, LAPSCO - Laboratory of Social and Cognitive Psychology, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Yves BoirieDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, University Teaching Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Diet and Musculoskeletal Health Team, CRNH, INRA, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Martine DuclosDepartment of Sport Medicine and Functional Explorations, University Teaching Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Diet and Musculoskeletal Health Team, CRNH, INRA, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Daniel CourteixLaboratory AME2P, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraDepartment of Biostatistics, University Teaching Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
David ThivelLaboratory AME2P, University of Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRLaboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive · FRRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince adolescents with obesity are prone to bone fragility during weight loss, the aim was to compare the impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on bone density, geometry, and strength.

methodsSixty-one adolescents were randomly assigned to 2 cycling trainings (HIIT and MICT) and a control (CTR, without training) group. Anthropometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with hip structural analysis and the trabecular bone score (TBS) were assessed before and after the 16-week intervention.

resultsBody mass index (BMI) and fat mass (FM) percentage decreased at T1 versus T0 in both training groups (p < 0.001 for HIIT, p = 0.01 for MICT), though to a larger extent in HIIT (p < 0.05). Total body bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) increased in both training groups (p < 0.001), but to a greater extent in HIIT for BMC (p < 0.05). Lumbar spine BMD and BMC increased in both training groups (p < 0.001 for HIIT, p < 0.01 for MICT), with a time × group interaction between HIIT and CTR (p < 0.05) only. TBS increased in both training groups (p < 0.01 for HIIT, p < 0.05 for MICT). Hip BMD and BMC increased in both HIIT (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01) and MICT (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). At the narrow neck (NN), endocortical diameter, width (p < 0.01), cross-sectional moment of inertia, and section modulus (Z) (p < 0.05) increased only in the HIIT group, such as BMD and Z (p < 0.05) at the intertrochanteric region (IT) and average cortical thickness (p < 0.001) and width (p < 0.05) at the femoral shaft. At the NN and IT, the buckling ratio decreased only in the HIIT group (p < 0.05), predicting higher resistance to fracture.

conclusionsIn addition to inducing greater BMI and FM percentage decreases in comparison to MICT, HIIT improves multisite bone density, geometry, and strength, which heighten the justification for HIIT as part of weight loss interventions in adolescents with obesity.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingPediatric ObesityAdolescentBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesHumansWeight LossBone mineral densityBone strengthChildhood obesityHigh-intensity interval trainingModerate-intensity continuous training

Identifiers

PMID34864737
PMCPMC8820153
OpenAlexW4200102454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.