ArticleTuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)2022
Low-cost 3D-printed inverted microscope to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a MODS culture.
Article in Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Smartphone-Based Low-Cost Inverted Laser Fluorescence Microscope for Disease Diagnosis.Biosensors · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
MODS, an assay for diagnosis of tuberculosis and drug-susceptibility, is based in the microscopic observation of the characteristic cords of Mycobacterium tuberculosis colonies grown in liquid media. An inverted optical microscope (100× magnification) is required to observe and interpret MODS cultures. Unfortunately, the cost of commercial inverted microscopes is not affordable in low resource settings. To perform a diagnosis of tuberculosis using the MODS assay, images with modest quality are enough for proper interpretation. Therefore, the use of a high cost commercial inverted optical microscope is not indispensable. In this study, we designed a prototype of an optical inverted microscope created by 3D-printing and based on a smartphone. The system was evaluated with 226 MODS TB positive and 207 MODS TB negative digital images. These images were obtained from 10 sputum samples MODS positive and 10 sputum samples MODS negative. The quality of all images was assessed by a qualified technician, in terms of adequacy to interpret and classify them as positive or negative for tuberculosis. The quality of the images was considered appropriate for MODS interpretation. All the 20 samples were correctly classified (as TB positive/negative) by reading with the prototype 3D-printed inverted microscope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.