Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34864164›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2022

Lung Cancer Screening Considerations During Respiratory Infection Outbreaks, Epidemics or Pandemics: An International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Detection and Screening Committee Report.

Rudolf M Huber, Milena Cavic, Anna Kerpel-Fronius, Lucia Viola, John Field, Long Jiang, Ella A Kazerooni, Coenraad F N Koegelenberg, Anant Mohan, Ricardo Sales Dos Santos and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. ACE2: the node connecting the lung cancer and COVID-19.American journal of cancer research · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Rudolf M HuberDivision of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medicine V, Ludwig-Maximilian-University of Munich, Thoracic Oncology Centre Munich, German Centre for Lung Research (DZL CPC-M), Munich, Germany. Electronic address: Huber@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Milena CavicDepartment of Experimental Oncology, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Anna Kerpel-FroniusDepartment of Radiology, National Korányi Institute for Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
Lucia ViolaThoracic Oncology Unit, Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia.
John FieldRoy Castle Lung Cancer Research Programme, The University of Liverpool, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Long JiangShanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ella A KazerooniDivision of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School/Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School/Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Coenraad F N KoegelenbergDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Anant MohanDepartment of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ricardo Sales Dos SantosHospital Cárdio Pulmonar da Bahia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luigi VenturaThoracic Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Italy.
Murry WynesThe International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, Denver, Colorado.
Dawei YangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Javier ZuluetaDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Choon-Taek LeeDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Martin C TammemägiPrevention and Cancer Control, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Claudia I HenschkeDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Stephen LamDepartment of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer and Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
members of the Diagnostics Working Group
Early Detection and Screening Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the results of two large, randomized trials, the global implementation of lung cancer screening is of utmost importance. However, coronavirus disease 2019 infections occurring at heightened levels during the current global pandemic and also other respiratory infections can influence scan interpretation and screening safety and uptake. Several respiratory infections can lead to lesions that mimic malignant nodules and other imaging changes suggesting malignancy, leading to an increased level of follow-up procedures or even invasive diagnostic procedures. In periods of increased rates of respiratory infections from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and others, there is also a risk of transmission of these infections to the health care providers, the screenees, and patients. This became evident with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic that led to a temporary global stoppage of lung cancer and other cancer screening programs. Data on the optimal management of these situations are not available. The pandemic is still ongoing and further periods of increased respiratory infections will come, in which practical guidance would be helpful. The aims of this report were: (1) to summarize the data available for possible false-positive results owing to respiratory infections; (2) to evaluate the safety concerns for screening during times of increased respiratory infections, especially during a regional outbreak or an epidemic or pandemic event; (3) to provide guidance on these situations; and (4) to stimulate research and discussions about these scenarios.

Indexed as

COVID-19Lung NeoplasmsRespiratory Tract InfectionsDisease OutbreaksEarly Detection of CancerHumansLungPandemicsSARS-CoV-2CoronavirusEpidemicLung cancer screeningPandemicRespiratory infectionsScreening and early detection

Identifiers

PMID34864164
PMCPMC8639478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.