Changes in e-cigarette and cigarette use during pregnancy and their association with small-for-gestational-age birth.

backgroundDespite increased e-cigarette use, limited research has focused on changes in e-cigarette and combustible cigarette use around pregnancy and the subsequent effects on infant health.

objectiveThis study aimed to characterize changes in e-cigarette and cigarette use from before to during pregnancy and examine their associations with small-for-gestational-age birth. STUDY

designThis was a secondary data analysis of 2016-2018 data of the US Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. We analyzed women aged ≥18 years who had a recent live birth (unweighted: n=105,438; weighted: n=5,446,900). Women were grouped on the basis of their self-reported e-cigarette and/or cigarette use 3 months before pregnancy (exclusive e-cigarette users, exclusive cigarette smokers, dual users, and nonusers) and change in e-cigarette and cigarette use during pregnancy (continuing use, quitting, switching, and initiating use). Small-for-gestational-age was defined as a birthweight below the 10th percentile for infants of the same sex and gestational age. We described the distributions of women's sociodemographic and pregnancy characteristics in both weighted and unweighted samples. We used multivariable log-binomial regression models to estimate the relative risks for the associations between changes in e-cigarette and cigarette use during pregnancy and risk of small-for-gestational-age, adjusting for significant covariates.

resultsThe rates of cessation during pregnancy were the highest among exclusive e-cigarette users (weighted percentage, 80.7% [49,378/61,173]), followed by exclusive cigarette users (54.4% [421,094/773,586]) and dual users (46.4% [69,136/149,152]). Among exclusive e-cigarette users, continued users of e-cigarettes during pregnancy had a higher risk of small-for-gestational-age than nonusers (16.5% [1849/11,206]) vs 8.8% [384,338/4,371,664]; confounder-adjusted relative risk, 1.52 [95% confidence interval, 1.45-1.60]), whereas quitters of e-cigarettes had a similar risk of small-for-gestational-age with nonusers (7.7% [3730/48,587] vs 8.8% [384,338/4,371,664]; relative risk, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.87]). Among exclusive cigarette users, those who completely switched to e-cigarettes during pregnancy also had a similar risk of small-for-gestational-age with nonusers (7.6% [259/3412] vs 8.8% [384,338/4,371,664]; relative risk, 0.83 [95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.93]). Among dual users before pregnancy, the risk of small-for-gestational-age decreased from 23.2% (7240/31,208) (relative risk, 2.53 [95% confidence interval, 2.47-2.58]) if continuing use to 16.9% (6617/39,142) (relative risk, 1.88 [95% confidence interval, 1.83-1.92]) if only quitting e-cigarettes or 15.1% (1254/8289) (relative risk, 1.61 [95% confidence interval, 1.52-1.70]) if only quitting cigarettes and further to 11.2% (7589/67,880) (relative risk, 1.23 [95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.25]) if both quitting e-cigarettes and cigarettes during pregnancy, compared with nonusers.

conclusionAmong exclusive e-cigarette users, quitting e-cigarettes during pregnancy normalized the risk of small-for-gestational-age. Among exclusive cigarette users, quitting smoking or completely switching to e-cigarettes normalized small for gestational age risk. Among dual users, smoking cessation has a greater effect than quitting e-cigarettes only, although discontinuing the use of both may lead to the greatest reduction in the risk of small-for-gestational-age.