Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34863298›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica communications2021

Machine learning modeling of genome-wide copy number alteration signatures reliably predicts IDH mutational status in adult diffuse glioma.

Nicholas Nuechterlein, Linda G Shapiro, Eric C Holland, Patrick J Cimino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multi-Omics Approaches in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas NuechterleinPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Linda G ShapiroPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Eric C HollandDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Patrick J CiminoDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. pjjc@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0441-4502
University of Washington · USCape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

CHARACTERIZING AGGRESSIVE GLIOMA COPY NUMBER SUBTYPESK08CA245037 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CIMINO, PATRICK J. · 2020 to 2021
$512k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA245037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of 1p/19q-codeletion and IDH1/2 mutational status is necessary to interpret any investigational study of diffuse gliomas in the modern era. While DNA sequencing is the gold standard for determining IDH mutational status, genome-wide methylation arrays and gene expression profiling have been used for surrogate mutational determination. Previous studies by our group suggest that 1p/19q-codeletion and IDH mutational status can be predicted by genome-wide somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) data alone, however a rigorous model to accomplish this task has yet to be established. In this study, we used SCNA data from 786 adult diffuse gliomas in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to develop a two-stage classification system that identifies 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas and predicts the IDH mutational status of astrocytic tumors using a machine-learning model. Cross-validated results on TCGA SCNA data showed near perfect classification results. Furthermore, our astrocytic IDH mutation model validated well on four additional datasets (AUC = 0.97, AUC = 0.99, AUC = 0.95, AUC = 0.96) as did our 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma screen on the two datasets that contained oligodendrogliomas (MCC = 0.97, MCC = 0.97). We then retrained our system using data from these validation sets and applied our system to a cohort of REMBRANDT study subjects for whom SCNA data, but not IDH mutational status, is available. Overall, using genome-wide SCNAs, we successfully developed a system to robustly predict 1p/19q-codeletion and IDH mutational status in diffuse gliomas. This system can assign molecular subtype labels to tumor samples of retrospective diffuse glioma cohorts that lack 1p/19q-codeletion and IDH mutational status, such as the REMBRANDT study, recasting these datasets as validation cohorts for diffuse glioma research.

Indexed as

Machine LearningBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseWhole Genome SequencingBiomarkers, TumorIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseAdult diffuse gliomaAstrocytomaCopy numberGLASSGlioblastomaIDHIsocitrate dehydrogenaseOligodendrogliomaREMBRANDTTCGA

Identifiers

PMID34863298
PMCPMC8645099
OpenAlexW4200297561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.