Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34863281›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2021

Grapevine wood microbiome analysis identifies key fungal pathogens and potential interactions with the bacterial community implicated in grapevine trunk disease appearance.

Fotios Bekris, Sotirios Vasileiadis, Elena Papadopoulou, Anastasios Samaras, Stefanos Testempasis, Danae Gkizi, Georgia Tavlaki, Aliki Tzima, Epaminondas Paplomatas, Emmanuel Markakis and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. First Report ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Biocontrol Potential of Raw Olive Mill Waste AgainstPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Impact of the Biocontrol Product, EsquiveJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fotios BekrisLaboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Viopolis, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, 41500, Larissa, Greece.
Sotirios VasileiadisLaboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Viopolis, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, 41500, Larissa, Greece.
Elena PapadopoulouLaboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Viopolis, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, 41500, Larissa, Greece.
Anastasios SamarasPlant Pathology Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Stefanos TestempasisPlant Pathology Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Danae GkiziLaboratory of Plant Pathology, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855, Athens, Greece.
Georgia TavlakiLaboratory of Mycology, Department of Viticulture, Vegetable Crops, Floriculture and Plant Protection, Institute of Olive Tree, Subtropical Crops and Viticulture, Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, 32A Kastorias Street, Mesa Katsabas, 71307, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Aliki TzimaLaboratory of Plant Pathology, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855, Athens, Greece.
Epaminondas PaplomatasLaboratory of Plant Pathology, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855, Athens, Greece.
Emmanuel MarkakisLaboratory of Mycology, Department of Viticulture, Vegetable Crops, Floriculture and Plant Protection, Institute of Olive Tree, Subtropical Crops and Viticulture, Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, 32A Kastorias Street, Mesa Katsabas, 71307, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
George KaraoglanidisPlant Pathology Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Kalliope K PapadopoulouLaboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Viopolis, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, 41500, Larissa, Greece.
Dimitrios G KarpouzasLaboratory of Plant and Environmental Biotechnology, Viopolis, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, 41500, Larissa, Greece. dkarpouzas@uth.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1573-7983
University of Thessaly · GRAgricultural University of Athens · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRMediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania · GR

Funding

general secretariat for research and technology 6070.03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) is a disease complex caused by wood pathogenic fungi belonging to genera like Phaeomoniella, Phaeoacremonium, Fomitiporia, Eutypa and members of the family Botryosphaeriaceae. However, the co-occurrence of these fungi in symptomatic and asymptomatic vines at equivalent abundances has questioned their role in GTDs. Hence, we still lack a good understanding of the fungi involved in GTDs, their interactions and the factors controlling their assemblage in vines. We determined the fungal and bacterial microbiome in wood tissues of asymptomatic and symptomatic vines of three main Greek cultivars (Agiorgitiko, Xinomavro, Vidiano), each cultivated in geographically distinct viticultural zones, using amplicon sequencing.

resultsWe noted that cultivar/biogeography (lumped factor) was the strongest determinant of the wood fungal microbiome (p < 0.001, 22.7%), while GTD symptoms condition had a weaker but still significant effect (p < 0.001, 3.5%), being prominent only in the cultivar Xinomavro. Several fungal Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs), reported as GTD-associated pathogens like Kalmusia variispora, Fomitiporia spp., and Phaemoniella chlamydosporα (most dominant in our study), were positively correlated with symptomatic vines in a cultivar/viticultural zone dependent manner. Random Forest analysis pointed to P. chlamydosporα, K. variispora, A. alternata and Cladosporium sp., as highly accurate predictors of symptomatic vines (0% error rate). The wood bacterial microbiome showed similar patterns, with biogeography/cultivar being the main determinant (p < 0.001, 25.5%) of its composition, followed by the GTD status of vines (p < 0.001, 5.2%). Differential abundance analysis revealed a universal positive correlation (p < 0.001) of Bacillus and Streptomyces ASVs with asymptomatic vines. Network analysis identified a significant negative co-occurrence network between these bacterial genera and Phaemoniella, Phaeoacrominum and Seimatosporium. These results point to a plant beneficial interaction between Bacillus/Streptomyces and GTD pathogens.

conclusionsOur study (a) provides evidence that GTD symptomatic plants support a wood fungal microbiome, showing cultivar and biogeography-dependent patterns, that could be used as a proxy to distinguish between healthy and diseased vines, (b) points to strong interactions between the bacterial and fungal wood microbiome in asymptomatic vines that should be further pursued in the quest for discovery of novel biocontrol agents.

Indexed as

BacteriaBiogeographyFungiGrapevineGrapevine cultivarsTrunk diseasesWood microbiome

Identifiers

PMID34863281
PMCPMC8642934
OpenAlexW4200185204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.