Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34863278›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Examining non-technical skills for ad hoc resuscitation teams: a scoping review and taxonomy of team-related concepts.

J Colin Evans, M Blair Evans, Meagan Slack, Michael Peddle, Lorelei Lingard

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Leveraging just-in-time simulation to train ad hoc teams.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
    Article
  10. Just-in-time simulation for ad hoc teams: applications for surgical trainees.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J Colin EvansDivision of Emergency Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada. jevans96@uwo.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0084-230X
M Blair EvansDepartment of Psychology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Meagan SlackMiddlesex-London Paramedic Service, London, ON, Canada.
Michael PeddleDivision of Emergency Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Lorelei LingardCentre for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-technical skills (NTS) concepts from high-risk industries such as aviation have been enthusiastically applied to medical teams for decades. Yet it remains unclear whether-and how-these concepts impact resuscitation team performance. In the context of ad hoc teams in prehospital, emergency department, and trauma domains, even less is known about their relevance and impact.

methodsThis scoping review, guided by PRISMA-ScR and Arksey & O'Malley's framework, included a systematic search across five databases, followed by article selection and extracting and synthesizing data. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they pertained to NTS for resuscitation teams performing in prehospital, emergency department, or trauma settings. Articles were subjected to descriptive analysis, coherence analysis, and citation network analysis.

resultsSixty-one articles were included. Descriptive analysis identified fourteen unique non-technical skills. Coherence analysis revealed inconsistencies in both definition and measurement of various NTS constructs, while citation network analysis suggests parallel, disconnected scholarly conversations that foster discordance in their operationalization across domains. To reconcile these inconsistencies, we offer a taxonomy of non-technical skills for ad hoc resuscitation teams.

conclusionThis scoping review presents a vigorous investigation into the literature pertaining to how NTS influence optimal resuscitation performance for ad hoc prehospital, emergency department, and trauma teams. Our proposed taxonomy offers a coherent foundation and shared vocabulary for future research and education efforts. Finally, we identify important limitations regarding the traditional measurement of NTS, which constrain our understanding of how and why these concepts support optimal performance in team resuscitation.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamResuscitationCommunicationEmergency Service, HospitalHumansAd Hoc teamEmergency medicineNon-technical skillsPrehospitalResuscitationScoping reviewTrauma

Identifiers

PMID34863278
PMCPMC8642998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.