Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34863271›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2021

Cyathostomin resistance to moxidectin and combinations of anthelmintics in Australian horses.

Ghazanfar Abbas, Abdul Ghafar, John Hurley, Jenni Bauquier, Anne Beasley, Edwina J A Wilkes, Caroline Jacobson, Charles El-Hage, Lucy Cudmore, Peter Carrigan and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Egg reappearance periods of anthelmintics against equine cyathostomins: The state of play revisited.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: Current status and emerging trends.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ghazanfar AbbasMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Abdul GhafarMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
John HurleySwettenham Stud, Nagambie, VIC, Australia.
Jenni BauquierMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Anne BeasleySchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
Edwina J A WilkesSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Caroline JacobsonCentre for Animal Production and Health, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Charles El-HageMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Lucy CudmoreScone Equine Hospital, Scone, NSW, Australia.
Peter CarriganScone Equine Hospital, Scone, NSW, Australia.
Brett Tennent-BrownMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Charles G GauciMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Martin K NielsenDepartment of Veterinary Science, M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Kristopher J HughesSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Ian BeveridgeMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia.
Abdul JabbarMelbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC, Australia. jabbara@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8888-0046
The University of Melbourne · AUCharles Sturt University · AUMurdoch University · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCyathostomins are the most important and common parasitic nematodes of horses, with > 50 species known to occur worldwide. The frequent and indiscriminate use of anthelmintics has resulted in the development of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in horse nematodes. In this study we assessed the efficacy of commonly used anthelmintics against cyathostomins in Australian thoroughbred horses.

methodsTwo drug efficacy trials per farm were conducted on two thoroughbred horse farms in the state of Victoria, Australia. In the first trial, the horses on Farm A were treated with single and combinations of anthelmintics, including oxfendazole (OFZ), abamectin (ABM), abamectin and morantel (ABM + MOR), moxidectin (MOX) and oxfendazole and pyrantel (OFZ + PYR), at the recommended doses, whereas the horses on Farm B only received MOX, at the recommended dose. The faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) was used to determine the efficacy and egg reappearance period (ERP) of anthelmintics. Based on the results of the first trial, the efficacies of MOX and a combination of ABM + MOR were reassessed to confirm their activities against cyathostomins.

resultsOf the five anthelmintic products tested on Farm A, resistance against OFZ, ABM and OFZ + PYR was found, with efficacies of - 41% (- 195% lower confidence limit [LCL]), 73% (60% LCL) and 82% (66% LCL) at 2 weeks post-treatment, respectively. The FECRT showed high efficacies of MOX and ABM + MOR (100%) at 2 week post-treatment and shortened ERPs for these anthelmintics (ABM + MOR: 4 weeks; MOX: 5 weeks). Resistance to MOX was found on Farm B, with a reduced efficacy of 90% (70% LCL) and 89% (82% LCL) at 2 weeks post-treatment in trials one and two, respectively.

conclusionsThis study provides the first evidence of MOX- and multidrug-resistant (ABM and combinations of anthelmintics) cyathostomins in Australia and indicates the need for continuous surveillance of the efficacy of currently effective anthelmintics and large-scale investigations to assess the ERP for various anthelmintics.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MultipleAnimalsAnthelminticsBenzimidazolesEpidemiological MonitoringFaceFarmsFemaleHorse DiseasesHorsesIvermectinMacrolidesMaleMorantelNematodaNematode InfectionsabamectinAnthelminticsBenzimidazolesIvermectinMacrolidesMorantelmoxidectinoxfendazoleAustralian thoroughbred horsesCyathostominsEgg reappearance periodFECRTMoxidectinResistance

Identifiers

PMID34863271
PMCPMC8645149
OpenAlexW4200378304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.