Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34863089›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Genetic association tests in family samples for multi-category phenotypes.

Shuai Wang, James B Meigs, Josée Dupuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuai WangPfizer Inc, Global Product Development, Groton, CT, 06340, USA. shuai1107@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0984-5435
James B MeigsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Josée DupuisDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

Funding

TOPMed Omics of Type 2 Diabetes and Quantitative TraitsUM1DK078616 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MANNING, ALISA KNODLE · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
Rare Sequence Variation and Diabetes Quantitative TraitsU01DK078616 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MEIGS, JAMES B · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
TOPMed Omics of Cardiovascular Disease in DiabetesR01HL151855 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MEIGS, JAMES B · 2020 to 2023
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151855NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK078616NIDDK NIH HHS UM1 DK078616NIH HHS 1R01HL151855NIH HHS U01DK078616NIH HHS UM1DK078616-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvancements in statistical methods and sequencing technology have led to numerous novel discoveries in human genetics in the past two decades. Among phenotypes of interest, most attention has been given to studying genetic associations with continuous or binary traits. Efficient statistical methods have been proposed and are available for both types of traits under different study designs. However, for multinomial categorical traits in related samples, there is a lack of efficient statistical methods and software.

resultsWe propose an efficient score test to analyze a multinomial trait in family samples, in the context of genome-wide association/sequencing studies. An alternative Wald statistic is also proposed. We also extend the methodology to be applicable to ordinal traits. We performed extensive simulation studies to evaluate the type-I error of the score test, Wald test compared to the multinomial logistic regression for unrelated samples, under different allele frequency and study designs. We also evaluate the power of these methods. Results show that both the score and Wald tests have a well-controlled type-I error rate, but the multinomial logistic regression has an inflated type-I error rate when applied to family samples. We illustrated the application of the score test with an application to the Framingham Heart Study to uncover genetic variants associated with diabesity, a multi-category phenotype.

conclusionBoth proposed tests have correct type-I error rate and similar power. However, because the Wald statistics rely on computer-intensive estimation, it is less efficient than the score test in terms of applications to large-scale genetic association studies. We provide computer implementation for both multinomial and ordinal traits.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticGenetic Association StudiesHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideCategoricalEGEEFamily samplesFramingham heart studyGWASMultinomialOrdinalScore testSequencingWald test

Identifiers

PMID34863089
PMCPMC8642939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.