Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34863060›Full record

ArticleTalanta2022

Antibody mounting capability of 1D/2D carbonaceous nanomaterials toward rapid-specific detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Seyyed Alireza Hashemi, Sonia Bahrani, Seyyed Mojtaba Mousavi, Navid Omidifar, Nader Ghaleh Golab Behbahan, Mohammad Arjmand, Seeram Ramakrishna, Ayrat M Dimiev, Kamran Bagheri Lankarani, Mohsen Moghadami and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Talanta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Two-Dimensional (2D) materials in the detection of SARS-CoV-2.Microchemical journal : devoted to the application of microtechniques in all branches of science · 2023
    Article
  5. Recent progress on rapid diagnosis of COVID-19 by point-of-care testing platforms.Chinese chemical letters = Zhongguo hua xue kuai bao · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Seyyed Alireza HashemiNanomaterials and Polymer Nanocomposites Laboratory, School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Sonia BahraniHealth Policy Research Center, Health Institute, Shiraz University of Medica Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyyed Mojtaba MousaviDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.
Navid OmidifarDepartment of Pathology, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Electronic address: omidifarn@sums.ac.ir.
Nader Ghaleh Golab BehbahanRazi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) Shiraz Branch, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad ArjmandNanomaterials and Polymer Nanocomposites Laboratory, School of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada. Electronic address: mohammad.arjmand@ubc.ca.
Seeram RamakrishnaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Nanofibers and Nanotechnology, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: seeram@nus.edu.sg.
Ayrat M DimievLaboratory for Advanced Carbon Nanomaterials, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya st., 18, Kazan, Russian Federation.
Kamran Bagheri LankaraniHealth Policy Research Center, Health Institute, Shiraz University of Medica Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohsen MoghadamiNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad FiroozsaniMember of Board of Trustees, Zand Institute of Higher Education, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbonaceous immunosensors are ideal nanoplatforms for developing rapid, precise, and ultra-specific diagnostic kits capable of early detection of viral infectious illnesses such as COVID-19. However, developing a proper carbonic immunosensor requires stepwise protocols to find optimum operating conditions to minimize drawbacks. Herein, for the first time and through a stepwise protocol, activation, and monoclonal IgG antibody mounting capability of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) at two diverse outer diameters (ODs), viz., 20-30 nm and 50-80 nm, and graphene deriv atives (graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO)) were examined and compared with each other toward finding the prime carbonaceous nanomaterial(s) for maximized antibody loading efficiency along with an ideal detection limit (DL) and sensitivity. Next, the effect of common amplifying agents, i.e., Au nanostars (Au NSs) and Ag nanowires (Ag NWs), on the total performance of the best carbonaceous structure was carefully assessed, and the responsible detection mechanism is investigated in detail. Next, the developed carbonaceous immunosensors were assessed via voltammetric and impedance assays, and their performances toward specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen through immunoreaction were examined in detail. The study's outcome showed the superior performance of conjugated rGO-based immunosensor with Au NSs toward specific and quick (1 min) detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in biological fluids compared with other 1D/2D carbonaceous nanomaterials.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesCOVID-19GraphiteNanostructuresNanotubes, CarbonElectrochemical TechniquesHumansImmunoassaySARS-CoV-2GraphiteNanotubes, CarbonCarbon nanotubeCovid-19Electrochemical detectionGrapheneSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34863060
PMCPMC8628627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.