ArticleTropical animal health and production2021
Small ruminants milk from Tunisian oasis: physicochemical characteristics, mineral contents, and microbiological quality.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evaluation of somatic cell count, microbiological quality and basic composition of sheep milk.Archives animal breeding · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characteristics and quality aspects of milk from native ovine Queue Fine de l'Ouest (QFO) and the exotic D'man (DMN) breeds were investigated and compared with those of two subgroups of the local goat population Arbi and Serti. A total of 418 individual milk samples were collected from multiparous lactating animals reared in the continental oasis region of Tunisia. Samples were analyzed for physical parameters (pH, density, and acidity), chemical composition (dry matter, fat, protein, lactose, casein, ash, and casein/protein ratio), mineral concentrations (Ca, P, Na, K, and Ca/P) and microbiological features (total mesophilic aerobic bacteria (TMAB), total coliforms count (TCC), lactic acid bacteria (LAB), sulphite-reducing Clostridium (CSR), yeast and molds (Y/M), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Escherichia coli (E. coli), and Salmonella) according to standard methods. The values obtained for physicochemical, mineral, and microbial parameters revealed noticeable differences in the milk of the four studied breeds. On the whole milk samples, the mean value of pH, density, and acidity in milk collected from sheep breeds appeared higher than in milk collected from goat subgroups. As for milk composition, results showed a remarkable disparity between studied breeds and clear superiority of sheep breeds compared to goat's subgroups in all chemical contents being studied (dry matter, fat, protein, lactose, casein, and ash). The differences are more important, especially for dry matter, fat, protein, and casein content, whereas casein/protein ratio distinguished goat's genotypes, and the highest one was obtained for Serti Subgroup. When comparing sheep versus goat's milk for macro-minerals, the current study indicated lower K and higher concentrations of Ca, P, and Na. The milk of QFO sheep, the richest in casein and protein, was expressed with significantly higher levels of calcium and phosphorus compared to the DMN sheep breed and the two goat subgroups. The microbiological examination evidenced that the milk of both species complies with standard criteria required by the Tunisian legislation on the hygiene of milk and dairy products. The microbial quality of ewe milk was higher than goat milk, based on LAB and Y/M, while goats produced milk with better quality referring to TMAB and TCC counts. No significant differences were found for Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli between examined breeds. Got results highlighted the complete absence of the two dangerous pathogens Salmonella and CSR in all investigated samples of small ruminants' milk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.