Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34862755›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2022

ENPEP as a potential predictor of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy.

Aoyun Wang, Han Chu, Zheng Jin, Zhihua Gong, Qingzhu Jia, Bo Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aoyun WangInstitute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2666-713X
Han ChuCenter of Growth, Metabolism and aging, Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zheng JinResearch Institute, GloriousMed Clinical Laboratory (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Zhihua GongInstitute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Qingzhu JiaInstitute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Bo ZhuInstitute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Army Medical University · CNShanghai FRP Research Institute (China) · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gene ENPEP encodes glutamyl aminopeptidase, which can cut N-terminal aspartic acid from angiotensin II, and is related to tumorigenesis and immune microenvironment, however, the association between the expression of ENPEP and benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has had no investigation.

methodsWe assess the immunotherapeutic predictive performance of ENPEP expression and mutation in multiple cohorts, including one discovery cohort (Pender cohort), four validation cohorts (Hugo cohort; Liu cohort; Mariathasan cohort; Zhao cohort), and one mutation cohort (Miao cohort). Cohorts from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were used to explore mechanism and analysis prognosis.

resultsIn the discovery cohort, patients with lower ENPEP expression had superior response rates (47.2% vs. 36.1%) and over-all survival (OS) (HR [95% CI] = 0.61 [0.39-0.96]; p = 0.032) compared with those with higher ENPEP expression. The association between ENPEP and immunotherapy efficacy was consistently observed in validation cohorts (Hugo: OS HR [95% CI] = 0.41 [0.11-1.45], p = 0.158; Liu: OS HR [95% CI] = 0.73 [0.44-1.20], p = 0.211; Mariathasan: OS HR [95% CI] = 0.84 [0.65-1.09], p = 0.181; Zhao: OS HR [95% CI] = 0.20 [0.04-1.01], p = 0.033; Pooled cohort: OS HR [95% CI] = 0.76 [0.61-0.95], p = 0.015), and in the mutation cohort (ENPEP mutation vs. wild type (WT), OS HR [95% CI] = 0.46 [0.26-0.93], p = 0.017). Reliably, ENPEP is associated with M2 macrophage infiltration and activation in TCGA.

conclusionsOur results demonstrated ENPEP is a potential biomarker to classify patients' response to ICIs treatment.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyMutationPrognosisTumor MicroenvironmentImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsbiomarkerENPEPimmunotherapymacrophage

Identifiers

PMID34862755
PMCPMC8817092
OpenAlexW3215326722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.