ReviewActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2022
Machine Learning in Pituitary Surgery.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Radiomic study of common sellar region lesions differentiation in magnetic resonance imaging based on multi-classification machine learning model.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Evaluating capabilities of large language models: Performance of GPT-4 on surgical knowledge assessments.Surgery · 2024Article
- Current state and promise of user-centered design to harness explainable AI in clinical decision-support systems for patients with CNS tumors.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Review
- Evaluating Capabilities of Large Language Models: Performance of GPT4 on Surgical Knowledge Assessments.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning applications in neurosurgery are increasingly reported for diverse tasks such as faster and more accurate preoperative diagnosis, enhanced lesion characterization, as well as surgical outcome, complications and healthcare cost prediction. Even though the pertinent literature in pituitary surgery is less extensive with respect to other neurosurgical diseases, past research attempted to answer clinically relevant questions to better assist surgeons and clinicians. In the present chapter we review reported ML applications in pituitary surgery including differential diagnosis, preoperative lesion characterization (immunohistochemistry, cavernous sinus invasion, tumor consistency), surgical outcome and complication predictions (gross total resection, tumor recurrence, and endocrinological remission, cerebrospinal fluid leak, postoperative hyponatremia). Moreover, we briefly discuss from a practical standpoint the current barriers to clinical translation of machine learning research. On the topic of pituitary surgery, published reports can be considered mostly preliminary, requiring larger training populations and strong external validation. Thoughtful selection of clinically relevant outcomes of interest and transversal application of model development pipeline-together with accurate methodological planning and multicenter collaborations-have the potential to overcome current limitations and ultimately provide additional tools for more informed patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34862553What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.