ArticleActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2022
Introduction to Deep Learning in Clinical Neuroscience.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in brain tumor diagnosis and surgical planning: Recent advances.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Brain Tumors.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- A novel federated deep learning scheme for glioma and its subtype classification.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- A Feasibility Study on Deep Learning Based Brain Tumor Segmentation Using 2D Ellipse Box Areas.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of deep learning (DL) is rapidly increasing in clinical neuroscience. The term denotes models with multiple sequential layers of learning algorithms, architecturally similar to neural networks of the brain. We provide examples of DL in analyzing MRI data and discuss potential applications and methodological caveats.Important aspects are data pre-processing, volumetric segmentation, and specific task-performing DL methods, such as CNNs and AEs. Additionally, GAN-expansion and domain mapping are useful DL techniques for generating artificial data and combining several smaller datasets.We present results of DL-based segmentation and accuracy in predicting glioma subtypes based on MRI features. Dice scores range from 0.77 to 0.89. In mixed glioma cohorts, IDH mutation can be predicted with a sensitivity of 0.98 and specificity of 0.97. Results in test cohorts have shown improvements of 5-7% in accuracy, following GAN-expansion of data and domain mapping of smaller datasets.The provided DL examples are promising, although not yet in clinical practice. DL has demonstrated usefulness in data augmentation and for overcoming data variability. DL methods should be further studied, developed, and validated for broader clinical use. Ultimately, DL models can serve as effective decision support systems, and are especially well-suited for time-consuming, detail-focused, and data-ample tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.