Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34862526›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2022

Foundations of Machine Learning-Based Clinical Prediction Modeling: Part V-A Practical Approach to Regression Problems.

Victor E Staartjes, Julius M Kernbach

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Calculating Enzyme Inhibition with Random Forests.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Enhanced Deep-Learning Model for Carbon Footprints of Chemicals.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor E Staartjes *Machine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. victoregon.staartjes@usz.ch.
Julius M Kernbach *Neurosurgical Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Aachen (NAILA), Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter goes through the steps required to train and validate a simple, machine learning-based clinical prediction model for any continuous outcome. We supply fully structured code for the readers to download and execute in parallel to this section, as well as a simulated database of 10,000 glioblastoma patients who underwent microsurgery, and predict survival from diagnosis in months. We walk the reader through each step, including import, checking, splitting of data. In terms of pre-processing, we focus on how to practically implement imputation using a k-nearest neighbor algorithm. We also illustrate how to select features based on recursive feature elimination and how to use k-fold cross validation. We demonstrate a generalized linear model, a generalized additive model, a random forest, a ridge regressor, and a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regressor. Specifically for regression, we discuss how to evaluate root mean square error (RMSE), mean average error (MAE), and the R

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsHumansLinear ModelsPrognosisArtificial intelligenceClinical prediction modelMachine intelligenceMachine learningPredictionPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID34862526
OpenAlexW3216919099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.