Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34862442›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Robust anticipation of continuous steering actions from electroencephalographic data during simulated driving.

Giovanni M Di Liberto, Michele Barsotti, Giovanni Vecchiato, Jonas Ambeck-Madsen, Maria Del Vecchio, Pietro Avanzini, Luca Ascari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. EEG of the Dancing Brain: Decoding Sensory, Motor, and Social Processes during Dyadic Dance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni M Di Liberto *Henesis S.R.L., Strada Budellungo 2, 43123, Parma, PR, Italy. gdiliber@tcd.ie.
Michele Barsotti *Henesis S.R.L., Strada Budellungo 2, 43123, Parma, PR, Italy.
Giovanni VecchiatoInstitute of Neuroscience, National Research Council of Italy, Parma, Italy.
Jonas Ambeck-MadsenToyota Motor Europe, Bourgetlaan 60, 1140, Brussels, Belgium.
Maria Del VecchioInstitute of Neuroscience, National Research Council of Italy, Parma, Italy.
Pietro AvanziniInstitute of Neuroscience, National Research Council of Italy, Parma, Italy.
Luca AscariHenesis S.R.L., Strada Budellungo 2, 43123, Parma, PR, Italy.
National Research Council · ITToyota Motor Corporation (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driving a car requires high cognitive demands, from sustained attention to perception and action planning. Recent research investigated the neural processes reflecting the planning of driving actions, aiming to better understand the factors leading to driving errors and to devise methodologies to anticipate and prevent such errors by monitoring the driver's cognitive state and intention. While such anticipation was shown for discrete driving actions, such as emergency braking, there is no evidence for robust neural signatures of continuous action planning. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating continuous steering actions during a driving task in a car simulator with multimodal recordings of behavioural and electroencephalography (EEG) signals. System identification is used to assess whether robust neurophysiological signatures emerge before steering actions. Linear decoding models are then used to determine whether such cortical signals can predict continuous steering actions with progressively longer anticipation. Results point to significant EEG signatures of continuous action planning. Such neural signals show consistent dynamics across participants for anticipations up to 1 s, while individual-subject neural activity could reliably decode steering actions and predict future actions for anticipations up to 1.8 s. Finally, we use canonical correlation analysis to attempt disentangling brain and non-brain contributors to the EEG-based decoding. Our results suggest that low-frequency cortical dynamics are involved in the planning of steering actions and that EEG is sensitive to that neural activity. As a result, we propose a framework to investigate anticipatory neural activity in realistic continuous motor tasks.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalAutomobile DrivingCanonical Correlation AnalysisCerebral CortexComputer SimulationElectroencephalographyHumansLinear ModelsNeural Networks, ComputerPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID34862442
PMCPMC8642531
OpenAlexW3214902398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.