Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34862359›Full record

Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation as Stand-Alone Treatment for Post-Stroke Aphasia: Effects on Language and Verbal Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).

Jane B Allendorfer, Rodolphe Nenert, Jennifer Vannest, Jerzy P Szaflarski

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01512264 (Post-Stroke Aphasia and rTMS Treatment Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01512264 nacompletednot on this map

Post-Stroke Aphasia and rTMS Treatment Study (PART)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2012 to 2018Enrolled28ConditionsAphasia, StrokeArmsMagstim SuperRapid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances in Neuromodulation Techniques for Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jane B AllendorferDepartment of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6888-9000
Rodolphe NenertDepartment of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Jennifer VannestDepartment of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jerzy P SzaflarskiDepartment of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Post-Stroke Aphasia and rTMS Treatment (PART) StudyR01HD068488 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI SZAFLARSKI, JERZY P · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is an ongoing need for facilitating language recovery in chronic post-stroke aphasia. The primary aim of this study (NCT01512264) was to examine if noninvasive intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) applied to the injured left-hemispheric cortex promotes language improvements and fMRI changes in post-stroke aphasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS Participants were randomized to 3 weeks of sham (Tx0) or 1-3 weeks of iTBS (Tx123). We assessed participants who completed the first 2 functional MRI (fMRI) sessions (T1, T2) where they performed 2 overt language fMRI tasks, and examined longitudinal response after 3 months (T3). Language performance and fMRI activation changes, and relationships between these changes were assessed. RESULTS From T1 to T2, both groups showed improvements on the Boston Naming Test (BNT). From T1 to T3, Tx123 improved on the Aphasia Quotient, post-scan word recognition on the verbal paired associates task (VPAT), and perceived communicative ability. Each group exhibited significant activation changes between T1 and T2 for both tasks. Only the Tx123 group exhibited fMRI activation changes between T2 to T3 on the verb-generation task and between T1 and T3 on VPAT. Delayed aphasia symptom improvement for Tx123 was associated with increased left ventral visual stream activation from T1 to T3 (rho=0.74, P=0.0058), and with decreased bilateral supplementary motor area activation related to VPAT encoding from T2 to T3 (rho=-0.80, P=0.0016). CONCLUSIONS Observed iTBS-induced language improvements and associations between delayed fMRI changes and aphasia improvements support the therapeutic and neurorehabilitative potential of iTBS in post-stroke aphasia recovery.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAphasiaBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsStroke RehabilitationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34862359
PMCPMC8653428
OpenAlexW3216284508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.