Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34862327›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Defining and quantifying the core microbiome: Challenges and prospects.

Alexander T Neu, Eric E Allen, Kaustuv Roy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 297 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
297citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

297 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Advances in the Application of Forensic Microbiome Analysis in Tissue Source Inference].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

237 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander T NeuSection of Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; aneu@ucsd.edu kroy@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0833-1704
Eric E AllenSection of Molecular Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Kaustuv RoySection of Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; aneu@ucsd.edu kroy@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3693-1045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term "core microbiome" has become widely used in microbial ecology over the last decade. Broadly, the core microbiome refers to any set of microbial taxa, or the genomic and functional attributes associated with those taxa, that are characteristic of a host or environment of interest. Most commonly, core microbiomes are measured as the microbial taxa shared among two or more samples from a particular host or environment. Despite the popularity of this term and its growing use, there is little consensus about how a core microbiome should be quantified in practice. Here, we present a brief history of the core microbiome concept and use a representative sample of the literature to review the different metrics commonly used for quantifying the core. Empirical analyses have used a wide range of metrics for quantifying the core microbiome, including arbitrary occurrence and abundance cutoff values, with the focal taxonomic level of the core ranging from phyla to amplicon sequence variants. However, many of these metrics are susceptible to sampling and other biases. Developing a standardized set of metrics for quantifying the core that accounts for such biases is necessary for testing specific hypotheses about the functional and ecological roles of core microbiomes.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsEnvironmental MicrobiologyHumansPhylogeny16S ribosomal RNA genecore microbiomemicrobial ecologymicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID34862327
PMCPMC8713806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.