Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34862246›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Persistence of ctDNA in Patients with Breast Cancer During Neoadjuvant Treatment Is a Significant Predictor of Poor Tumor Response.

Qing Zhou, Simon P Gampenrieder, Sophie Frantal, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Christian F Singer, Daniel Egle, Georg Pfeiler, Rupert Bartsch, Viktor Wette, Angelika Pichler and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06087120 (Investigate the Prognostic and Predictive Value of Circulating Tumor DNA), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06087120 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Investigate the Prognostic and Predictive Value of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

TypeobservationalSponsorGene SolutionsRan2023 to 2025Enrolled125ConditionsBreast Cancer Female, Stage II Breast Cancer, Stage III Breast Cancer, HER2-positive Breast Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review of ctDNA in breast cancer - present utility and future perspectives.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Qing ZhouInstitute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7737-9643
Simon P GampenriederIIIrd Medical Department with Hematology and Medical Oncology, Hemostaseology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3966-1071
Sophie FrantalDepartment of Statistics, Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria.
Gabriel RinnerthalerIIIrd Medical Department with Hematology and Medical Oncology, Hemostaseology, Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Oncologic Center, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7438-1465
Christian F SingerDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel EgleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0283-8176
Georg PfeilerDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rupert BartschDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Viktor WetteBreast Center, Brustzentrum Kaernten, St. Veit, Austria.
Angelika PichlerDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, LKH Hochsteiermark-Leoben, Leoben, Austria.
Edgar PetruDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Peter C DubskyDepartment of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Zsuzsanna Bago-HorvathDepartment of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8555-7806
Christian FeslSalzburg Cancer Research Institute with Laboratory of Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (LIMCR) and Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (CCCIT), Salzburg, Austria.
Margaretha RudasDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Anders StåhlbergDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenberg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4243-0191
Ricarda GrafInstitute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sabrina WeberInstitute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0374-0349
Nadia DandachiDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Martin FilipitsDepartment of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Cancer Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2847-4534
Michael GnantComprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1002-2118
Marija Balic *Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9482-9191
Ellen Heitzer *Institute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic & Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8815-7859
Medical University of Graz · ATComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATParacelsus Medical University · ATAustrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group · ATBrustzentrum Klinik St. Anna · CHCancer Research Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKInnsbruck Medical University · ATLKH Hochsteiermark · ATSahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

ALF-agreement 716321Austrian National Bank 16971Swedish Cancer Society 19-0306Swedish Research Council 2017-01392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate response assessment during neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) poses a clinical challenge. Therefore, a minimally invasive assessment of tumor response based on cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be beneficial to guide treatment decisions. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe profiled 93 genes in tissue from 193 patients with early breast cancer. Patient-specific assays were designed for 145 patients to track ctDNA during NST in plasma. ctDNA presence and levels were correlated with complete pathological response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) as well as clinicopathologic characteristics of the tumor to identify potential proxies for ctDNA release.

resultsAt baseline, ctDNA could be detected in 63/145 (43.4%) patients and persisted in 25/63 (39.7%) patients at mid-therapy (MT) and 15/63 (23.8%) patients at the end of treatment. ctDNA detection at MT was significantly associated with higher RCB (OR = 0.062; 95% CI, 0.01-0.48; P = 0.0077). Of 31 patients with detectable ctDNA at MT, 30 patients (96.8%) were nonresponders (RCB II, n = 8; RCB III, n = 22) and only one patient responded to the treatment (RCB I). Considering all 145 patients with baseline (BL) plasma, none of the patients with RCB 0 and only 6.7% of patients with RCB I had ctDNA detectable at MT, whereas 30.6% and 29.6% of patients with RCB II/III, respectively, had a positive ctDNA result.

conclusionsOverall, our results demonstrate that the detection and persistence of ctDNA at MT may have the potential to negatively predict response to neoadjuvant treatment and identify patients who will not achieve pCR or be classified with RCB II/III.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCirculating Tumor DNAAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm, ResidualBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID34862246
PMCPMC9377752
OpenAlexW3215714894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.