Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34862166›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2022

Digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia and primary care costs in England: an interrupted time series analysis.

Chris Sampson, Eleanor Bell, Amanda Cole, Christopher B Miller, Tracey Marriott, Matt Williams, James Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chris SampsonThe Office of Health Economics, London, UK csampson@ohe.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-2369
Eleanor BellThe Office of Health Economics, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6733-2785
Amanda ColeThe Office of Health Economics, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6179-7752
Christopher B MillerSleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2936-7717
Tracey MarriottOxford Academic Health Science Network, The Magdalen Centre, Oxford, UK.
Matt WilliamsOxford Academic Health Science Network, The Magdalen Centre, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8592-0644
James RoseOxford Academic Health Science Network, The Magdalen Centre, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

aimTo identify the effect of a population-wide rollout of DESIGN &

settingThe study was conducted in the Thames Valley region of England, where access to

methodPrimary care data for people with relevant characteristics from nine general practices in Buckinghamshire was used. Primary care costs include general practice contacts and prescriptions. Segmented regression analysis was used to estimate primary and secondary outcomes.

resultsFor the 10 705 patients included in the sample, the total saving over the 65-week follow-up period was £71 027. This corresponds to £6.64 per person in the sample or around £70.44 per

conclusion

Indexed as

cognitive behavioural therapydigital technologyhealthcare costsinsomniainterrupted time series analysisprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID34862166
PMCPMC9447315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.