Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34862164›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2022

Perspectives of pharmacists in general practice from qualitative focus groups with patients during a pilot study.

Claire Mann, Claire Anderson, Matthew Boyd, Yasmin Karsan, Tristan Emerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Exploring consumer experiences of pharmacist prescribing - a scoping review.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. GPs' and pharmacists' views of integrating pharmacists into general practices: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claire MannCentre for Health Innovation, Leadership and Learning, Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK claire.mann@changextra.co.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-7970
Claire AndersonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5406-2296
Matthew BoydSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2997-5090
Yasmin KarsanSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0799-7902
Tristan EmersonSchool of English, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9915-8948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUtilising skill mix in general practice is proposed as a solution to the demand-supply issue. Pharmacists can play an important role in this context, leading to an increase in training and funding for independent prescriber roles. A role for pharmacists in general practice was funded, piloted, and evaluated by NHS England (NHSE) from 2015.

aimTo answer the following question: what is the patient perspective of pharmacists in patient-facing roles in general practice in the UK? DESIGN &

settingFocus group interviews exploring patient perspectives on the pharmacist role in the UK.

methodThirty-four patients were interviewed in five focus group (January-December 2016). Data were iteratively analysed using the one sheet of paper technique.

resultsWhile the public were aware of the primary care crisis, they were less well informed about potential solutions. Data showed patients primarily sought access to a clinician over expressing a preference for any type of clinician. Low awareness was shown about the pharmacist role and there was initial confusion about it. Acceptability levels were high. It was found that pharmacists added value and provided an expert medication-focused service, which had a positive impact on medicines use. Patients reported benefit from longer appointments, feeling they were not rushed, and that all their conditions were being considered holistically. They trusted pharmacists as experts in medication and trust was consolidated over time. Regular coaching from a pharmacist could lead to improved patient self-monitoring and self-care.

conclusionPharmacists can add value to the general practice team and this is recognised by patients.

Indexed as

general practicemedication reviewmedicines optimisationpatientspharmacistsprimary healthcare

Identifiers

PMID34862164
PMCPMC9447328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.