Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34861883›Full record

ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2021

Patient and clinician experiences and opinions of the use of a novel home use medical device in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease - a qualitative study.

Charlotte E Sedgwick, Charlotte Growcott, Shehnaz Akhtar, Daniel Parker, Erik Mulder Pettersen, Farina Hashmi, Anita Ellen Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte E SedgwickUniversity of Salford, School of Health & Society, Brian Blatchford Building, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
Charlotte GrowcottUniversity of Salford, School of Health & Society, Brian Blatchford Building, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
Shehnaz AkhtarUniversity of Salford, School of Health & Society, Brian Blatchford Building, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
Daniel ParkerUniversity of Salford, School of Health & Society, Brian Blatchford Building, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-1225
Erik Mulder PettersenDepartment of Surgery, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.
Farina HashmiUniversity of Salford, School of Health & Society, Brian Blatchford Building, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK. F.Hashmi@salford.ac.uk.
Anita Ellen WilliamsUniversity of Salford, School of Health & Society, Brian Blatchford Building, Frederick Road Campus, Salford, M6 6PU, UK.
Blatchford (United Kingdom) · GBNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

H2020 Fast Track to Innovation (2016) 737964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral vascular diseases have a significant impact on functional quality of life. Previous research has demonstrated the complex, limiting and costly economic implications of these conditions such as lower limb ulceration chronicity and ischaemic amputation. These complex, limb and life threatening conditions demand the development of novel interventions with objective research as part of that development. Hence, a novel intermittent negative pressure medical device in the form of a wearable boot (FlowOx™) was developed. As part of the development process, this study aimed to explore patient and clinician opinions of the boot.

methodsA qualitative approach was used to collect patient and clinician experiences in Norway. An advisory group informed the semi-structured questions used in seven patient interviews and one clinician focus group (n = 5). The data were recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. Patient and clinician data were analysed as distinct groups using a thematic process.

resultsData analysis resulted in five themes from the patients which gave insight into; the impact of the disease process; practicalities of using the boot, positive experiences of use; perceived outcomes; reflecting on use. Six themes were created from the clinicians. These gave insight into; ideal outcomes and how to measure them; ways to potentially use the boot; using research in healthcare; positives of the device; observed effects and next steps; potential improvements to the device.

conclusionThis study provides insight into the experiences and opinions of FlowOx™. Patients and clinicians were positive about the device due to its ease of use. Those patients with peripheral arterial disease experienced significantly more benefit, especially for ischaemic ulceration than those with a chronic venous condition. Clinicians placed value on the patient reported outcomes in the treatment decision-making process. This preliminary study into experiences of FlowOx™ use provides valuable feedback that will inform design modification and ongoing research into implementation points and prospective user groups. FlowOx™ demonstrates potential as a conservative therapy offering users a convenient, home use, self-care management solution for improving symptomatic peripheral arterial disease and quality of life.

Indexed as

Peripheral Arterial DiseaseQuality of LifeFocus GroupsHumansProspective StudiesQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID34861883
PMCPMC8642923
OpenAlexW3137975979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.