ReviewJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2022
Using big data of genetics, health claims, and brain imaging to challenge the categorical classification in mental illness.
Review in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in Autism Traits from Early Childhood To Adolescence in the Study To Explore Early Development.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025Article
- Exploring dopamine as the master regulator of brain circuitry and mental health genome.Gene & protein in disease · 2025Article
- Changes in Autism Traits from Early Childhood to Adolescence in the Study to Explore Early Development.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Neurogenetics of Brain Connectivity: Current Approaches to the Study (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychiatric disorders in first-degree relatives (FDRs) often differ from the index patient's diagnosis, suggesting that there is genetic contribution to psychiatric disorders in which related cases do not all map to the same diagnosis as the index case. Our aim is to look for psychiatric comorbidities across major mental illnesses using three approaches, genetics, clinical diagnosis, and brain imaging to address common associations and pathology among mental illnesses. Genome-wide association studies from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium showed single gene polymorphisms are common across 5 major psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder (MDD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Clinically, results of Taiwan's nationwide population studies showed that other major psychiatric disorders were more likely to coaggregate in families with an index case of an individual with a psychiatric disorder, compared to control families. Finally, resting functional connectivity (FC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and whole-brain connectomic analysis of SZ, BD I, BD II, MDD, and healthy controls revealed that the four groups of patients shared similar patterns of abnormal neural substrate in the brain that differed from controls. In conclusion, using big data from genetics, administrative health claims, and brain imaging, we identified concordance, indicating dimensional coherence of genetic heritability, clinical mutual associations, and common neurobiological substrates across major psychiatric disorders. These results will challenge the current diagnostic classification system and possibly move psychiatry beyond descriptive syndromes towards a nosology informed by disease cause.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.