Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34861596›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2021

Statistical neuroscience in the single trial limit.

Alex H Williams, Scott W Linderman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dynamic Compression Flows for Neuroscience Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Calibrating Bayesian Decoders of Neural Spiking Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. How far neuroscience is from understanding brains.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mice exhibit stochastic and efficient action switching during probabilistic decision making.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex H WilliamsDepartment of Statistics and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, USA.
Scott W LindermanDepartment of Statistics and Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, USA. Electronic address: scott.linderman@stanford.edu.

Funding

Towards a Unified Framework for Dopamine Signaling in the StriatumU19NS113201 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SABATINI, BERNARDO L · 2019 to 2023
$18.7M
Neural representation of mating partners by male C. elegansR01NS113119 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LINDERMAN, SCOTT WARREN, SAMUEL, ARAVINTHAN D. · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
Tracking Changes in High-Dimensional Circuit Behaviors over Long-Term Neural RecordingsF32MH122998 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, ALEXANDER HENRY · 2020 to 2021
$127k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH122998NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113119NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS113201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual neurons often produce highly variable responses over nominally identical trials, reflecting a mixture of intrinsic 'noise' and systematic changes in the animal's cognitive and behavioral state. Disentangling these sources of variability is of great scientific interest in its own right, but it is also increasingly inescapable as neuroscientists aspire to study more complex and naturalistic animal behaviors. In these settings, behavioral actions never repeat themselves exactly and may rarely do so even approximately. Thus, new statistical methods that extract reliable features of neural activity using few, if any, repeated trials are needed. Accurate statistical modeling in this severely trial-limited regime is challenging, but still possible if simplifying structure in neural data can be exploited. We review recent works that have identified different forms of simplifying structure - including shared gain modulations across neural subpopulations, temporal smoothness in neural firing rates, and correlations in responses across behavioral conditions - and exploited them to reveal novel insights into the trial-by-trial operation of neural circuits.

Indexed as

NeuronsNeurosciencesAnimalsBehavior, Animal

Identifiers

PMID34861596
PMCPMC13104381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.