ArticleIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Relationship between ablation index and myocardial biomarkers after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Article in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mirror mirror on the wall: Which is the best ablation index of all?Indian pacing and electrophysiology journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFurther in-vivo evidence is needed to support the usefulness of ablation index (AI) in guiding atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We aimed at evaluating the relationship between AI and other lesion indicators and the release of myocardial-specific biomarkers following radiofrequency AF ablation.
methodsForty-six patients underwent a first-time radiofrequency AF ablation and were prospectively enrolled in this study. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed by six experienced electrophysiologists with a point-by-point approach, guided by strict Visitag criteria and consistent AI target values. Myocardial-specific biomarkers troponin T and creatine kinase myocardial band were measured after 6 (TnT6 and CKMB6) and 20 h (TnT20 and CKMB20) following sheath removal. Ablation duration, impedance drop (ID), force-time integral (FTI) and AI were registered automatically and analyzed offline.
resultsTnT release was 985 ± 495 ng/L and 1038 ± 461 ng/L (p = ns) while CKMB release was 7.3 ± 2.7 μg/L and 6.5 ± 2.1 μg/L (p < 0.001) at 6 and 20 h respectively. Ablation duration, ID, FTI and AI were all significantly correlated with the release of myocardial-specific biomarkers both at 6 and 20 h. Ablation index showed the highest degree of correlation with TnT6, TnT20, CKMB6 and CKMB20 (Pearson's R 0.69, 0.69, 0.61, 0.64 respectively, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that AI had the strongest association with TnT6, TnT20, CKMB6 and CKMB20 (β 0.43, β 0.71, β 0.44 and β 0.43 respectively).
conclusionAblation index appears as the strongest lesion indicator as measured by the release of myocardial-specific biomarkers following radiofrequency catheter ablation for AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.