Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34861051›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of immunology2022

High CD4-to-CD8 ratio identifies an at-risk population susceptible to lethal COVID-19.

Marco De Zuani, Petra Lazničková, Veronika Tomašková, Martina Dvončová, Giancarlo Forte, Gorazd Bernard Stokin, Vladimir Šrámek, Martin Helán, Jan Frič

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. RSC advances · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco De ZuaniInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1230-2714
Petra LazničkováInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-0517
Veronika TomaškováDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6565-2531
Martina DvončováDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Giancarlo ForteInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1341-1023
Gorazd Bernard StokinInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8430-8755
Vladimir ŠrámekDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin HelánInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9021-4947
Jan FričInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6642-797X
Masaryk University · CZUniversity Hospital Brno · CZInstitute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion · CZ

Funding

DRO (Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion - UHKT) 00023736ENOCH CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000868European Regional Development Fund - ProjectEuropean Social Fund and European Regional Development Fund-Project MAGNET CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000492FNUSA-ICRC CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/19_074/0016274Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic NU21J-05-00056Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic NV18-06-00529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around half of people with severe COVID-19 requiring intensive care unit (ICU) treatment will survive, but it is unclear how the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 differs between ICU patients that recover and those that do not. We conducted whole-blood immunophenotyping of COVID-19 patients upon admission to ICU and during their treatment and uncovered marked differences in their circulating immune cell subsets. At admission, patients who later succumbed to COVID-19 had significantly lower frequencies of all memory CD8+ T cell subsets, resulting in increased CD4-to-CD8 T cell and neutrophil-to-CD8 T cell ratios. ROC and Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that both CD4-to-CD8 and neutrophil-to-CD8 ratios at admission were strong predictors of in-ICU mortality. Therefore, we propose the use of the CD4-to-CD8 T cell ratio as a marker for the early identification of those individuals likely to require enhanced monitoring and/or pro-active intervention in ICU.

Indexed as

AgedCD4-CD8 RatioCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCOVID-19FemaleHumansImmunophenotypingIntensive Care UnitsLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2CD4-to-CD8 ratioCOVID-19Intensive care unitSARS-CoV-2T cellsTEMRA

Identifiers

PMID34861051
PMCPMC9286348
OpenAlexW3216875506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.