ArticleThe Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians2017
Readability and Comprehensibility of Patient Information Leaflets for Antidiabetic Medications in Qatar.
Article in The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Readability of patient information leaflets for commonly used medicines in the UK, Germany and Türkiye: a cross-sectional document analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Mobile Phone Apps for Child Mental Health: Comprehensive Review and Content Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Review
- Article
- Improving health literacy of antibiotic use in people with cystic fibrosis (CF)-comparison of the readability of patient information leaflets (PILs) from the EU, USA and UK of 23 CF-related antibiotics used in the treatment of CF respiratory infections.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2023Article
- Article
- Readability of information imprinted in patient information leaflets (PILs) in Saudi Arabia: The case of antihypertensive medications.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2022Article
- Article
- The impact of using pictorial aids in caregivers' understanding of patient information leaflets of pediatric pain medications: A quasi-experimental study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022Article
- Development and psychometric validation for evaluating written medicine information in Thailand: The Consumer Information Rating Form.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Provision and Need for Medicine Information in Asia and Africa: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Drug safety · 2021Article
- Employing computational linguistics techniques to identify limited patient health literacy: Findings from the ECLIPPSE study.Health services research · 2021Article
- Assessing the Readability of Medicine Information Materials: The Case of Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital - Mixed Approach.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Factors that Facilitate and Hinder the Comprehension of Patient Information Leaflets (PILs): A Brief Scoping Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Understood? Evaluating the readability and understandability of intranasal corticosteroid delivery instructions.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2020Article
- Comparative evaluation of drug information leaflets for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Palestine: local versus imported products.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- A comparative evaluation of medicine package inserts for oral antidiabetic agents in Palestine.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Readability of written medicine information materials in Arabic language: expert and consumer evaluation.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Calculating reading ease score of patient package inserts in Iran.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.