ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
A machine learning pipeline for classification of cetacean echolocation clicks in large underwater acoustic datasets.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-class, unsupervised detection and classification of biological and anthropogenic sounds in coral reefs.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Beaked whale dive behavior and acoustic detection range off Louisiana using three-dimensional acoustic tracking.PloS one · 2026Article
- Long-term monitoring of Ziphius cavirostris behavior using 3D tracking from fixed hydrophone arrays off Southern California.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the biodiversity of cetacean communities along the western North Atlantic Ocean shelf-break.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Evaluating the performance of automated detection systems for long-term monitoring of delphinids in diverse marine soundscapes.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Odontocete spatial patterns and temporal drivers of detection at sites in the Hawaiian islands.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Approach for Predictive Maintenance of the Electrical Submersible Pumps (ESPs).ACS omega · 2022Article
- Caller ID for Risso's and Pacific White-sided dolphins.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Discriminating and classifying odontocete echolocation clicks in the Hawaiian Islands using machine learning methods.PloS one · 2022Article
- Identification of western North Atlantic odontocete echolocation click types using machine learning and spatiotemporal correlates.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning algorithms, including recent advances in deep learning, are promising for tools for detection and classification of broadband high frequency signals in passive acoustic recordings. However, these methods are generally data-hungry and progress has been limited by challenges related to the lack of labeled datasets adequate for training and testing. Large quantities of known and as yet unidentified broadband signal types mingle in marine recordings, with variability introduced by acoustic propagation, source depths and orientations, and interacting signals. Manual classification of these datasets is unmanageable without an in-depth knowledge of the acoustic context of each recording location. A signal classification pipeline is presented which combines unsupervised and supervised learning phases with opportunities for expert oversight to label signals of interest. The method is illustrated with a case study using unsupervised clustering to identify five toothed whale echolocation click types and two anthropogenic signal categories. These categories are used to train a deep network to classify detected signals in either averaged time bins or as individual detections, in two independent datasets. Bin-level classification achieved higher overall precision (>99%) than click-level classification. However, click-level classification had the advantage of providing a label for every signal, and achieved higher overall recall, with overall precision from 92 to 94%. The results suggest that unsupervised learning is a viable solution for efficiently generating the large, representative training sets needed for applications of deep learning in passive acoustics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.