ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021
Deep Learning-Assisted Burn Wound Diagnosis: Diagnostic Model Development Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The intelligent lift: Artificial Intelligence's growing role in plastic surgery - a comprehensive review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Towards Home-Based Diabetic Foot Ulcer Monitoring: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- [Artificial intelligence-enabled full-course diagnosis and treatment for patients with severe burns and wounds requiring repair: from risk prediction to causal inference].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Burn and Wound Care: Image Analysis, Prediction, and Clinical Integration.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026Review
- DRDarkNet: a hybrid deep feature engineering model for accurate autopsy image classification.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Multimodal large language model versus emergency physicians for burn assessment: a prospective non-inferiority study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Burn Assessment: A Scoping Review with a Large Language Model-Generated Decision Tree.European burn journal · 2026Review
- The role of artificial intelligence in burn assessment, complication diagnosis, and outcome prediction: a narrative review.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Simultaneous prediction of early and delayed mortality in burn patients: a comparative machine learning analysis of feature importance in a single-center retrospective study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Review
- Current status, challenges, and prospects of artificial intelligence applications in wound repair theranostics.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Comparison of 3D and 2D area measurement of acute burn wounds with LiDAR technique and deep learning model.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Application of deep learning in wound size measurement using fingernail as the reference.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Review of machine learning for optical imaging of burn wound severity assessment.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate assessment of the percentage total body surface area (%TBSA) of burn wounds is crucial in the management of burn patients. The resuscitation fluid and nutritional needs of burn patients, their need for intensive unit care, and probability of mortality are all directly related to %TBSA. It is difficult to estimate a burn area of irregular shape by inspection. Many articles have reported discrepancies in estimating %TBSA by different doctors.
objectiveWe propose a method, based on deep learning, for burn wound detection, segmentation, and calculation of %TBSA on a pixel-to-pixel basis.
methodsA 2-step procedure was used to convert burn wound diagnosis into %TBSA. In the first step, images of burn wounds were collected from medical records and labeled by burn surgeons, and the data set was then input into 2 deep learning architectures, U-Net and Mask R-CNN, each configured with 2 different backbones, to segment the burn wounds. In the second step, we collected and labeled images of hands to create another data set, which was also input into U-Net and Mask R-CNN to segment the hands. The %TBSA of burn wounds was then calculated by comparing the pixels of mask areas on images of the burn wound and hand of the same patient according to the rule of hand, which states that one's hand accounts for 0.8% of TBSA.
resultsA total of 2591 images of burn wounds were collected and labeled to form the burn wound data set. The data set was randomly split into training, validation, and testing sets in a ratio of 8:1:1. Four hundred images of volar hands were collected and labeled to form the hand data set, which was also split into 3 sets using the same method. For the images of burn wounds, Mask R-CNN with ResNet101 had the best segmentation result with a Dice coefficient (DC) of 0.9496, while U-Net with ResNet101 had a DC of 0.8545. For the hand images, U-Net and Mask R-CNN had similar performance with DC values of 0.9920 and 0.9910, respectively. Lastly, we conducted a test diagnosis in a burn patient. Mask R-CNN with ResNet101 had on average less deviation (0.115% TBSA) from the ground truth than burn surgeons.
conclusionsThis is one of the first studies to diagnose all depths of burn wounds and convert the segmentation results into %TBSA using different deep learning models. We aimed to assist medical staff in estimating burn size more accurately, thereby helping to provide precise care to burn victims.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.