Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34860621›Full record

ArticleExpert review of clinical immunology2022

The infection risks of JAK inhibition.

Maryam A Adas, Edward Alveyn, Emma Cook, Mrinalini Dey, James B Galloway, Katie Bechman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of clinical immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Large-scale meta-analysis of infection risk with JAK-STAT inhibitors in 29,000 patients.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Infection risk with JAK inhibitors in dermatoses: a meta-analysis.International journal of dermatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Therapeutic targeting of the cGAS-STING pathway in human disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Updated review of Janus kinase inhibitors for the management of inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maryam A AdasCentre of Rheumatic diseases, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5560-6603
Edward AlveynCentre of Rheumatic diseases, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Emma CookCentre of Rheumatic diseases, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Mrinalini DeyInstitute of Life Course & Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
James B GallowayCentre of Rheumatic diseases, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1230-2781
Katie BechmanCentre of Rheumatic diseases, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R001332/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionJanus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have shown to be highly effective in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. As with all immunomodulatory therapies, careful assessment of any treatment-associated infection risk is essential to inform clinical decision-making. AREAS COVERED: We summarize current literature on infection rates among the licensed JAKi using published phase II/III trial results, post-licensing and registry data. EXPERT OPINION: licensed JAKi show increased risk of infection across the class compared to placebo, most commonly affecting respiratory and urinary tracts, nasopharynx and skin. This risk is dose-dependent. Risks are similar at licensed JAKi doses to that seen with biologic therapies. The risk is compounded by other risk factors for infection, such as age and steroid co-prescription. Herpes zoster reactivation is more common with JAKi compared to other targeted immune modulation, making screening for varicella exposure and vaccination in appropriate cohorts an advisable strategy. Crucially, these small risk increases must be balanced against the known harms (including infection) of uncontrolled autoimmune disease. JAKi are a safe and potentially transformative treatment when used for appropriately selected patients.

Indexed as

Janus Kinase InhibitorsHumansJanus Kinase InhibitorsAdultsAdverse eventsinflammatory diseaseJAK inhibitorsolder adultsserious infectionstuberculosisvaccinationvaricella zoster

Identifiers

PMID34860621
PMCPMC8935945
OpenAlexW3216889368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.