Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34860569›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2022

Ultrasound-guided core biopsy in the diagnosis of parotid neoplasia: an overview and update with a review of the literature.

Katharine Julia Hurry, Dilhara Karunaratne, Suzanne Westley, Alessandra Booth, Keith C R B Ramesar, Ting Ting Zhang, Michael Williams, David C Howlett

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparative Outcomes of Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy for Parotid Masses.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Katharine Julia HurryDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Sussex, East Sussex.
Dilhara KarunaratneDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Broomfield Hospital, Broomfield, England.
Suzanne WestleyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, England.
Alessandra BoothQueen Mary University, London Dental Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Keith C R B RamesarHistopathology Department, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Sussex, East Sussex.
Ting Ting ZhangBrighton and Sussex NHS Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Michael WilliamsDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Sussex, East Sussex.
David C HowlettDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Sussex, East Sussex.
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust · GBBroomfield Hospital · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBQueen Victoria Hospital · GBSussex Community NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccurate diagnosis of parotid neoplasia is a key to determine the most appropriate patient management choice, including the need for surgery. This review provides an update of the literature on current practice and outcomes of parotid tissue sampling techniques, with an emphasis on ultrasound-guided core biopsy (USCB) and comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC).

methodsA literature review of EMBASE, Medline, PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted.

resultsUSCB has higher sensitivity, specificity and lower non-diagnostic rates than optimized FNAC. It also has a significantly higher sensitivity for the detection of malignancy. Significant complications post-USCB are uncommon, with only one reported case of tumour seeding and no cases of permanent facial nerve dysfunction. The technique is less operator-dependent than FNAC, with less reported variation in results between institutions.

conclusionsUSCB can be considered as the optimum tool of choice for the diagnosis of parotid neoplasia. This would particularly be the case in centres utilizing FNAC with high non-diagnostic rates or reduced diagnostic accuracy when compared to USCB published data, or in centres establishing a new service. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: An update of the role and outcomes of USCB in the diagnosis of parotid gland pathologies.Research shows that USCB preforms better than FNAC, in terms of sensitivity and specificity, particularly in the case of malignant neoplasia.Complications following USCB were found to be higher than that of FNAC; however, no long-term major complications following either method have been reported in the literature.

Indexed as

Biopsy, Fine-NeedleBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMeta-Analysis as TopicParotid GlandParotid NeoplasmsSensitivity and SpecificitySystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID34860569
PMCPMC8822560
OpenAlexW3215172457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.