ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
A Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Algorithm as a Predictor of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- External validation of four venous thromboembolism risk assessment models after colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study.Thrombosis journal · 2025Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Long-Term Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer patients experience an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In this study, we investigated a risk of venous thromboembolism algorithm (RVTA) in patients with colorectal cancer and evaluated its ability to predict the prognosis of colorectal cancer. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 345 patients with colorectal cancer from January 2015 to December 2018 at the Shanghai Cancer Center to develop the RVTA. Additionally, the 345 patients were followed until December 2020 for prognostic analysis. The RVTA included the following variables: (a) platelet count, (b) blood transfusion history, (c) metastasis, (d) multiple chemotherapy regimens, and (e) the D-dimer level. Good predictive efficiency was observed for the RVTA (AUC was 0.825; 95% CI was 0.721 to 0.930). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who had a score less than 4 (0-3), defined as the low-risk group, was significantly longer than that of the high-risk group, which included patients who had a score greater than 4 (4-8) (26 vs ten months,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.