Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859598›Full record

ReviewEMBO molecular medicine2022

Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.

Antoine Leuzy, Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren, Sebastian Palmqvist, Shorena Janelidze, Jeffrey L Dage, Oskar Hansson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO molecular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 212 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
212citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
30.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

212 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 313 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Dulaglutide and neurodegeneration biomarkers: REWIND post hoc analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Distinct ocular microvascular alterations in Alzheimer's disease and cerebral small vessel disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

152 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antoine LeuzyClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4542-7879
Niklas Mattsson-CarlgrenClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8885-7724
Sebastian PalmqvistClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9267-1930
Shorena JanelidzeClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2869-8378
Jeffrey L DageStark Neuroscience Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2192-1699
Oskar HanssonClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8467-7286
Lund University · SEIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG062422 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Gil Dan Rabinovici · 2019 to 2026
$36.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) represent a mounting public health challenge. As these diseases are difficult to diagnose clinically, biomarkers of underlying pathophysiology are playing an ever-increasing role in research, clinical trials, and in the clinical work-up of patients. Though cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET)-based measures are available, their use is not widespread due to limitations, including high costs and perceived invasiveness. As a result of rapid advances in the development of ultra-sensitive assays, the levels of pathological brain- and AD-related proteins can now be measured in blood, with recent work showing promising results. Plasma P-tau appears to be the best candidate marker during symptomatic AD (i.e., prodromal AD and AD dementia) and preclinical AD when combined with Aβ42/Aβ40. Though not AD-specific, blood NfL appears promising for the detection of neurodegeneration and could potentially be used to detect the effects of disease-modifying therapies. This review provides an overview of the progress achieved thus far using AD blood-based biomarkers, highlighting key areas of application and unmet challenges.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersHumansPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAlzheimerAβbiomarkersbloodP-tau

Identifiers

PMID34859598
PMCPMC8749476
OpenAlexW3214939633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.