Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859593›Full record

ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2022

Brain stimulation: a therapeutic approach for the treatment of neurological disorders.

Jose Antonio Camacho-Conde, Maria Del Rosario Gonzalez-Bermudez, Marta Carretero-Rey, Zafar U Khan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Precision non-invasive brain stimulation: anJournal of neural engineering · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jose Antonio Camacho-CondeLaboratory of Neurobiology, CIMES, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-8462
Maria Del Rosario Gonzalez-BermudezLaboratory of Neurobiology, CIMES, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Marta Carretero-ReyLaboratory of Neurobiology, CIMES, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Zafar U KhanLaboratory of Neurobiology, CIMES, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0742-399X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain stimulation has become one of the most acceptable therapeutic approaches in recent years and a powerful tool in the remedy against neurological diseases. Brain stimulation is achieved through the application of electric currents using non-invasive as well as invasive techniques. Recent technological advancements have evolved into the development of precise devices with capacity to produce well-controlled and effective brain stimulation. Currently, most used non-invasive techniques are repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), whereas the most common invasive technique is deep brain stimulation (DBS). In last decade, application of these brain stimulation techniques has not only exploded but also expanded to wide variety of neurological disorders. Therefore, in the current review, we will provide an overview of the potential of both non-invasive (rTMS and tDCS) and invasive (DBS) brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of such brain diseases.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationBrainHumansMental DisordersNervous System Diseasesdeep brain stimulationinvasive brain stimulationnon-invasive brain stimulationrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationtranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34859593
PMCPMC8673710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.