Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859519›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

Efficacy and comparative effectiveness of telephone and smartphone remote continuing care interventions for alcohol use disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

James R McKay, David H Gustafson, Megan Ivey, Klaren Pe-Romashko, Brenda Curtis, Tyrone Thomas, David W Oslin, Daniel Polsky, Andrew Quanbeck, Kevin G Lynch

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Using causal mediation to examine self-efficacy as a mechanism through which continuing care interventions reduce alcohol use.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Mobile Health Interventions for Substance Use Disorders.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

James R McKayCenter for Studies of Addiction, Perelman School of Medicine. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5876-1687
David H GustafsonCenter for Health Enhancement System Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0660-1902
Megan IveyCenter for Studies of Addiction, Perelman School of Medicine. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Klaren Pe-RomashkoCenter for Health Enhancement System Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5208-0458
Brenda CurtisTechnology and Translational Research Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Health, Biomedical Research Center, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-2511-3322
Tyrone ThomasCenter for Studies of Addiction, Perelman School of Medicine. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David W OslinCenter for Studies of Addiction, Perelman School of Medicine. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4392-4599
Daniel PolskyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8403-9612
Andrew QuanbeckDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0762-4804
Kevin G LynchCenter for Studies of Addiction, Perelman School of Medicine. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-0323
Philadelphia VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Wisconsin System · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Digital Markers in Relapse and RecoveryZIADA000628 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI CURTIS, BRENDA · 2019 to 2025
$10.0M
Impact of enhancements to smartphone-based continuing care for alcohol dependenceR01AA022595 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUSTAFSON, DAVID H, MCKAY, JAMES R. · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
Adaptive Treatment Models for the Management of Drug Use DisordersK24DA029062 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MCKAY, JAMES R. · 2010 to 2021
$1.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022595NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA029062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsManagement of alcohol use disorder (AUD) could be enhanced by effective remote treatments. This study tested whether supplementing intensive outpatient programs (IOPs) with continuing care delivered via (1) telephone, (2) smartphone or (3) their combination improves outcomes relative to (4) IOP only. Continuing care conditions were also compared.

designRandomized controlled trial of four groups with 3-, 6-, 9-, 12- and 18-month follow-ups.

settingUniversity research center in Philadelphia, PA, USA.

participantsParticipants (n = 262) met DSM-V criteria for AUD, were largely male (71%) and African American (82%). INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: Telephone monitoring and counseling (TMC; n = 59), addiction comprehensive health enhancement support system (ACHESS; n = 68) and TMC + ACHESS (n = 70) provided for 12 months. The control condition received IOP only (TAU; n = 65). MEASUREMENT: The primary outcome was percentage of days heavy drinking (PDHD) in months 1-12. Secondary outcomes were any drinking, any drug use, drinking consequences and quality of life.

findingsMean PDHD in months 1-12 was 10.29 in TAU, 5.41 in TMC, 6.80 in ACHESS and 5.99 in TMC + ACHESS. PDHD was lower in TMC [Cohen's d = 0.35, P = 0.018, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (-1.42, -0.20)], ACHESS [d = 0.31, P = 0.031, 95% CI = (-1.27, -0.06)] and TMC + ACHESS [d = 0.36, P = 0.009, 95% CI = (-1.40, -0.20)] than in TAU. Differences between TMC + ACHESS, TMC and ACHESS were small (d ≤ 0.06) and non-significant. Findings were inconclusive as to whether or not the treatment conditions differed on PDHD at 18 months. A significant effect was obtained on any drinking, which was higher in months 1-12 in TAU than in TMC [odds ratio (OR) = 3.02, standard error (SE) = 0.43, 95% CI = (1.30, 6.99), P = 0.01] and TMC + ACHESS [OR = 2.43, SE = 0.39, 95% CI = (1.12, 5.27), P = 0.025). No other significant effects were obtained on other secondary outcomes during or after treatment.

conclusionsA telephone-delivered intervention and a smartphone-delivered intervention, alone and in combination, provided effective remote continuing care for alcohol use disorder. The combination of both interventions was not superior to either alone and effects did not persist post-treatment.

Indexed as

AlcoholismAlcohol DrinkingHumansMaleQuality of LifeSmartphoneTelephoneAlcohol use disordercontinuing careoutcomesmartphonetelephonetreatment

Identifiers

PMID34859519
PMCPMC10600977
OpenAlexW3215112933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.