Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859403›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry.

Vanessa Moreno, Elizabeth A Smith, Sergio Piña-Oviedo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Immunostaining Methods for Lysosomal Storage Disorder Research.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optical sorting: past, present and future.Light, science & applications · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vanessa MorenoArkana Laboratories, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Elizabeth A SmithArkana Laboratories, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Sergio Piña-OviedoDepartment of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. SPinaoviedo@uams.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunofluorescence is an important immunochemical technique that utilizes fluorescence-labeled antibodies to detect specific target antigens. It is used widely in both scientific research and clinical laboratories. Immunofluorescence allows for excellent sensitivity and amplification of signal in comparison to immunohistochemistry. However, analysis of samples labeled with fluorescence-labeled antibodies has to be performed using a fluorescence microscope or other type of fluorescence imaging. There are two methods available: direct (primary) and indirect (secondary) immunofluorescence. Here, we describe the principle of immunofluorescence methods as well as the preparation of fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues for both direct and indirect immunofluorescence labeling.

Indexed as

ImmunohistochemistryAntibodiesAntigensFluorescent Antibody TechniqueFormaldehydeLaboratories, ClinicalParaffin EmbeddingTissue FixationAntibodiesAntigensFormaldehydeDirect immunofluorescenceFFPEFresh-frozenImmunofluorescenceImmunohistochemistryIndirect immunofluorescence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.