Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859300›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2022

Cold snare polypectomy for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor: a prospective clinical trial (pilot study).

Kohei Takizawa, Naomi Kakushima, Masaki Tanaka, Noboru Kawata, Masao Yoshida, Yohei Yabuuchi, Yoshihiro Kishida, Kenichiro Imai, Sayo Ito, Hirotoshi Ishiwatari and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kohei TakizawaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan. koh.takizawa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7702-0427
Naomi KakushimaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Masaki TanakaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Noboru KawataDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Masao YoshidaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yohei YabuuchiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yoshihiro KishidaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kenichiro ImaiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Sayo ItoDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hirotoshi IshiwatariDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kinichi HottaDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki MatsubayashiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Keita MoriClinical Trial Coordination Office, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki OnoDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Shizuoka Cancer Center · JPSapporo Gakuin University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgoundCold snare polypectomy (CSP) can minimize the risk of adverse events and has become a standard treatment for small colorectal polyps. CSP might also be suitable for small superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). This study aimed to evaluate the safety of CSP for SNADETs.

methodsThe major indication criteria were as follows: (1) endoscopically diagnosed SNADET, (2) ≤ 10 mm, and (3) a single primary lesion. CSP was performed using an electrosurgical snare without electrocautery. Follow-up endoscopy and scar biopsy were performed 3 months after CSP. The primary endpoint was the delayed adverse events rate.

resultsIn total, 21 patients were enrolled. Two and 19 lesions were located in the duodenal bulb and 2nd portion, respectively; the median lesion size was 8 mm. CSP was attempted for all lesions; three lesions could not be resected without electrocautery and were removed by conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The rate of spurting bleeding after CSP was 0%. The median procedure time was 12 min, the median resected specimen size was 12 mm, and the rate of en bloc resection was 81% (17/21). No adverse events were observed intraoperatively, with no delayed adverse events after CSP. Histopathology revealed 15 adenomas, 4 cancers (intramucosal), and 2 non-neoplastic lesions. The horizontal margins were negative/positive/undetermined in 9, 1, and 11 cases, respectively. All vertical margins were negative. Only one recurrence was detected by follow-up endoscopy 3 months after CSP.

conclusionsCSP can be performed safely for small SNADETs. CLINICAL

trial registrationThis trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm ), and the registration number is UMIN000019157.

Indexed as

AdenomaColonic PolypsCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsDuodenal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsColonoscopyHumansMargins of ExcisionPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesCold polypectomyCold snare polypectomyDuodenal tumorEndoscopic resectionSuperficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor

Identifiers

PMID34859300
OpenAlexW3217724962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.