Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859297›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2022

Integrating trauma, self-disturbances, cognitive biases, and personality into a model for the risk of psychosis: a longitudinal study in a non-clinical sample.

Renata Pionke-Ubych, Dorota Frydecka, Andrzej Cechnicki, Martyna Krężołek, Barnaby Nelson, Łukasz Gawęda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Relationship Between Trauma Exposure and Nonclinical Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renata Pionke-UbychExperimental Psychopathology Lab, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jaracza 1, 00-378, Warsaw, Poland.
Dorota FrydeckaDepartment of Psychiatry, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Andrzej CechnickiDepartment of Community Psychiatry, Chair of Psychiatry, Medical College Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Martyna KrężołekII Department of Psychiatry, The Medical University of Warsaw, Warszaw, Poland.
Barnaby Nelson, Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Łukasz GawędaExperimental Psychopathology Lab, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jaracza 1, 00-378, Warsaw, Poland. l.gaweda@psych.pan.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6578-1846

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2016/21/B/HS6/03210Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2019/32/T/HS6/00572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothesis of the psychosis continuum enables to study the mechanisms of psychosis risk not only in clinical samples but in non-clinical as well. The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate self-disturbances (SD), a risk factor that has attracted substantial interest over the last two decades, in combination with trauma, cognitive biases and personality, and to test whether SD are associated with subclinical positive symptoms (PS) over a 12-month follow-up period. Our study was conducted in a non-clinical sample of 139 Polish young adults (81 females, age M = 25.32, SD = 4.51) who were selected for frequent experience of subclinical PS. Participants completed self-report questionnaires for the evaluation of SD (IPASE), trauma (CECA.Q), cognitive biases (DACOBS) and personality (TCI), and were interviewed for subclinical PS (CAARMS). SD and subclinical PS were re-assessed 12 months after baseline measurement. The hypothesized model for psychosis risk was tested using path analysis. The change in SD and subclinical PS over the 12-month period was investigated with non-parametric equivalent of dependent sample t-tests. The models with self-transcendence (ST) and harm avoidance (HA) as personality variables were found to be well-fitted and explained 34% of the variance in subclinical PS at follow-up. Moreover, we found a significant reduction of SD and subclinical PS after 12 months. Our study suggests that combining trauma, cognitive biases, SD and personality traits such as ST and HA into one model can enhance our understanding of appearance as well as maintenance of subclinical PS.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersBiasCognitionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPersonalityYoung AdultCognitive biasesPersonalityPsychosis riskSelf-disturbancesTrauma

Identifiers

PMID34859297
PMCPMC9388435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.