Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859281›Full record

ArticleOecologia2022

Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture-recapture modelling.

Lars K Lindsø, Pierre Dupont, Lars Rød-Eriksen, Ida Pernille Øystese Andersskog, Kristine Roaldsnes Ulvund, Øystein Flagstad, Richard Bischof, Nina E Eide

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular analysis of vector-borne pathogens in red foxes (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antimicrobial Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Ecological factors associated with fox feces density in anFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessing Red Fox (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lars K LindsøNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Høgskoleringen 9, 7034, Trondheim, Norway. lars.lindso@ibv.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5094-8583
Pierre DupontFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Universitetstunet 3, 1430, Ås, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7438-7995
Lars Rød-EriksenNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Høgskoleringen 9, 7034, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0482-4384
Ida Pernille Øystese AndersskogNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Høgskoleringen 9, 7034, Trondheim, Norway.
Kristine Roaldsnes UlvundNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Høgskoleringen 9, 7034, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1220-3230
Øystein FlagstadNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Høgskoleringen 9, 7034, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5534-8069
Richard BischofFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Universitetstunet 3, 1430, Ås, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-9183
Nina E EideNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, Høgskoleringen 9, 7034, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7645-3300

Funding

Miljødirektoratet (NO) 18S247E2Norges Forskningsråd grant 244557/E50Norges Forskningsråd NFR 286886Norges Forskningsråd Project ECOFUNCNorges Forskningsråd Project WildMap
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial capture-recapture modelling (SCR) is a powerful tool for estimating density, population size, and space use of elusive animals. Here, we applied SCR modelling to non-invasive genetic sampling (NGS) data to estimate red fox (Vulpes vulpes) densities in two areas of boreal forest in central (2016-2018) and southern Norway (2017-2018). Estimated densities were overall lower in the central study area (mean = 0.04 foxes per km

Indexed as

FoxesAnimalsFemaleMaleNorwayPopulation DensityProbabilityDensityNon-invasive genetic samplingRed foxSpatial capture–recapture

Identifiers

PMID34859281
PMCPMC8803778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.