Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859241›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances2021

Animal models of brain metastasis.

Lauritz Miarka, Manuel Valiente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Between Prometheus and Thanatos: Reflections on Intracardiac Injection Models for Metastasis in Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mucin 5AC Promotes Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis through cMET/CD44v6.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Metastatic organotropism in small cell lung cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Leveraging preclinical models of metastatic breast cancer.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The path to leptomeningeal metastasis.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lauritz MiarkaBrain Metastasis Group, Molecular Oncology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Manuel ValienteBrain Metastasis Group, Molecular Oncology Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-7542

Funding

Worldwide Cancer Research 19-0177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling of metastatic disease in animal models is a critical resource to study the complexity of this multi-step process in a relevant system. Available models of metastatic disease to the brain are still far from ideal but they allow to address specific aspects of the biology or mimic clinically relevant scenarios. We not only review experimental models and their potential improvements but also discuss specific answers that could be obtained from them on unsolved aspects of clinical management.

Indexed as

brain metastasisexperimental modelstherapytreatment toxicity

Identifiers

PMID34859241
PMCPMC8633729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.