Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34859223›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2021

C-reactive protein-guided use of procalcitonin in COVID-19.

Rebecca Houghton, Nathan Moore, Rebecca Williams, Fatima El-Bakri, Jonathan Peters, Matilde Mori, Gabrielle Vernet, Jessica Lynch, Henry Lewis, Maryanna Tavener and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca HoughtonHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Nathan MooreHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Rebecca WilliamsHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Fatima El-BakriHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Jonathan PetersHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Matilde MoriHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Gabrielle VernetHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Jessica LynchHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Henry LewisHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Maryanna TavenerHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Tom DurhamHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Jack BowyerHampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Hampshire, UK.
Kordo SaeedUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Gabriele PollaraRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5772-0322
Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA low procalcitonin (PCT) concentration facilitates exclusion of bacterial co-infections in COVID-19, but high costs associated with PCT measurements preclude universal adoption. Changes in inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), can be concordant, and predicting low PCT concentrations may avoid costs of redundant tests and support more cost-effective deployment of this diagnostic biomarker.

objectivesTo explore whether, in COVID-19, low PCT values could be predicted by the presence of low CRP concentrations.

methodsUnselected cohort of 224 COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital that underwent daily PCT and CRP measurements as standard care. Both 0.25 ng/mL and 0.5 ng/mL were used as cut-offs for positive PCT test results. Geometric mean was used to define high and low CRP values at each timepoint assessed.

resultsAdmission PCT was <0.25 ng/mL in 160/224 (71.4%), 0.25-0.5 ng/mL in 27 (12.0%) and >0.5 ng/mL in 37 (16.5%). Elevated PCT was associated with increased risk of death (

conclusionsCRP-guided PCT testing algorithms can reduce unnecessary PCT measurement and costs, supporting antimicrobial stewardship strategies in COVID-19.

Identifiers

PMID34859223
PMCPMC8633792
OpenAlexW3215762228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.